Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37382886›Full record

ArticleEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin2023

VectorNet: collaborative mapping of arthropod disease vectors in Europe and surrounding areas since 2010.

G R William Wint, Thomas Balenghien, Eduardo Berriatua, Marieta Braks, Cedric Marsboom, Jolyon Medlock, Francis Schaffner, Wim Van Bortel, Neil Alexander, Bulent Alten and 14 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Integrating indicator-based and event-based surveillance data for risk mapping of West Nile virus, Europe, 2006 to 2021.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Assessing the Risk of Windborne Dispersal ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2024
    Article
  19. Similarities betweenCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 13 institutions in 13 countries.

G R William WintEnvironmental Research Group Oxford Ltd, c/o Department of Biology, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Thomas BalenghienUnité Microbiologie, immunologie et maladies contagieuses, Institut Agronomique et Vétérinaire Hassan II, Rabat, Morocco.
Eduardo BerriatuaDepartamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Marieta BraksCentre for Zoonoses and Environmental Microbiology, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Cedric MarsboomAvia-GIS, Agro-Veterinary Information and Analysis, Zoersel, Belgium.
Jolyon MedlockMedical Entomology & Zoonoses Ecology, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, United Kingdom.
Francis SchaffnerFrancis Schaffner Consultancy, Riehen, Switzerland.
Wim Van BortelUnit Entomology and the Outbreak Research Team, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Neil AlexanderEnvironmental Research Group Oxford Ltd, c/o Department of Biology, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Bulent AltenHacettepe University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Ecology Division, VERG Laboratories, Beytepe, Ankara, Turkey.
Ewelina CzwienczekEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy.
Sofie DhollanderEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy.
Els DucheyneJohnson and Johnson, Beerse, Belgium.
Celine M GossnerDisease Programme Unit, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kayleigh HansfordMedical Entomology & Zoonoses Ecology, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, United Kingdom.
Guy HendrickxAvia-GIS, Agro-Veterinary Information and Analysis, Zoersel, Belgium.
Hector HonrubiaPublic Health Functions Unit, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tom MatheussenAvia-GIS, Agro-Veterinary Information and Analysis, Zoersel, Belgium.
Andrei Daniel MihalcaParasitology Consultancy Group, Corușu, Romania.
Dusan PetricFaculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Serbia.
Jane RichardsonEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy.
Hein SprongCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Veerle VersteirtAgentschap voor Natuur en Bos, Havenlaan 88, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Olivier BrietDisease Programme Unit, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden.
Avia-GIS (Belgium) · BEEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control · SEEuropean Food Safety Authority · ITNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLOxford Research Group · GBUK Health Security Agency · GBCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRHacettepe University · TRInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BESchaffner (Switzerland) · CHUniversidad de Murcia · ESUniversity of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca · ROUniversity of Novi Sad · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundArthropod vectors such as ticks, mosquitoes, sandflies and biting midges are of public and veterinary health significance because of the pathogens they can transmit. Understanding their distributions is a key means of assessing risk. VectorNet maps their distribution in the EU and surrounding areas.AimWe aim to describe the methodology underlying VectorNet maps, encourage standardisation and evaluate output.Methods: Vector distribution and surveillance activity data have been collected since 2010 from a combination of literature searches, field-survey data by entomologist volunteers via a network facilitated for each participating country and expert validation. Data were collated by VectorNet members and extensively validated during data entry and mapping processes.ResultsAs of 2021, the VectorNet archive consisted of ca 475,000 records relating to > 330 species. Maps for 42 species are routinely produced online at subnational administrative unit resolution. On VectorNet maps, there are relatively few areas where surveillance has been recorded but there are no distribution data. Comparison with other continental databases, namely the Global Biodiversity Information Facility and VectorBase show that VectorNet has 5-10 times as many records overall, although three species are better represented in the other databases. In addition, VectorNet maps show where species are absent. VectorNet's impact as assessed by citations (ca 60 per year) and web statistics (58,000 views) is substantial and its maps are widely used as reference material by professionals and the public.ConclusionVectorNet maps are the pre-eminent source of rigorously validated arthropod vector maps for Europe and its surrounding areas.

Indexed as

ArthropodsAnimalsArthropod VectorsDisease VectorsEuropeHumansMosquito Vectorsarthropod vectorsdistributionsmapsnetworkrisk assessmentvector-borne diseaseVectorNetvector surveillance

Identifiers

PMID37382886
PMCPMC10311950
OpenAlexW4382502183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.