Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37382885›Full record

ArticleEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin2023

COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic infection and hospitalisation in Belgium, July 2021 to May 2022.

Toon Braeye, Joris A F van Loenhout, Ruben Brondeel, Veerle Stouten, Pierre Hubin, Matthieu Billuart, Pui Yan Jenny Chung, Mathil Vandromme, Chloé Wyndham-Thomas, Koen Blot and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Scrutinizing the COVID-19 vaccine safety debate.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Toon BraeyeDepartment of Epidemiology and public health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Joris A F van LoenhoutDepartment of Epidemiology and public health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Ruben BrondeelDepartment of Epidemiology and public health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Veerle StoutenDepartment of Epidemiology and public health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Pierre HubinDepartment of Epidemiology and public health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Matthieu BilluartDepartment of Epidemiology and public health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Pui Yan Jenny ChungDepartment of Epidemiology and public health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Mathil VandrommeDepartment of Epidemiology and public health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Chloé Wyndham-ThomasDepartment of Epidemiology and public health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Koen BlotDepartment of Epidemiology and public health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Lucy CatteauDepartment of Epidemiology and public health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Sciensano (Belgium) · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundThe Belgian COVID-19 vaccination campaign aimed to reduce disease spread and severity.AimWe estimated SARS-CoV-2 variant-specific vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic infection (VEi) and hospitalisation (VEh), given time since vaccination and prior infection.MethodsNationwide healthcare records from July 2021 to May 2022 on testing and vaccination were combined with a clinical hospital survey. We used a test-negative design and proportional hazard regression to estimate VEi and VEh, controlling for prior infection, time since vaccination, age, sex, residence and calendar week of sampling.ResultsWe included 1,932,546 symptomatic individuals, of whom 734,115 tested positive. VEi against Delta waned from an initial estimate of 80% (95% confidence interval (CI): 80-81) to 55% (95% CI: 54-55) 100-150 days after the primary vaccination course. Booster vaccination increased initial VEi to 85% (95% CI: 84-85). Against Omicron, an initial VEi of 33% (95% CI: 30-36) waned to 17% (95% CI: 15-18), while booster vaccination increased VEi to 50% (95% CI: 49-50), which waned to 20% (95% CI: 19-21) 100-150 days after vaccination. Initial VEh for booster vaccination decreased from 96% (95% CI: 95-96) against Delta to 87% (95% CI: 86-89) against Omicron. VEh against Omicron waned to 73% (95% CI: 71-75) 100-150 days after booster vaccination. While recent prior infections conferred higher protection, infections occurring before 2021 remained associated with significant risk reduction against symptomatic infection. Vaccination and prior infection outperformed vaccination or prior infection only.ConclusionWe report waning and a significant decrease in VEi and VEh from Delta to Omicron-dominant periods. Booster vaccination and prior infection attenuated these effects.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesBelgiumHospitalizationHumansSARS-CoV-2Vaccine EfficacyCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19hospitalisationSARS-CoV-2symptomatic infectiontest-negativevaccinevaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID37382885
PMCPMC10311948
OpenAlexW4382501298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.