Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37382845›Full record

ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2023

Uterus Transplantation as a Surgical Innovation.

Alicia Pérez-Blanco, José-Antonio Seoane, Teresa Aldabo Pallás, Montserrat Nieto-Moro, Rocío Núñez Calonge, Alfonso de la Fuente, Dominique E Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alicia Pérez-BlancoOrganización Nacional de Trasplantes (ONT), Madrid, Spain.
José-Antonio SeoanePhilosophy, Constitution and Rationality Research Group, Faculty of Law, Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Teresa Aldabo PallásIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.
Montserrat Nieto-MoroPaediatric Critical Care Unit, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain.
Rocío Núñez CalongeUR International Group, Madrid, Spain.
Alfonso de la FuenteInstituto Europeo de Fertilidad, Madrid, Spain.
Dominique E MartinGeelong Waurn Ponds Campus, Locked Bag 20000, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia. Dominique.martin@deakin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-9363-0770

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uterus transplantation (UTx) research has been introduced in several countries, with trials in Sweden and the United States producing successful outcomes. The growing interest in developing UTx trials in other countries, such as Spain, the Netherlands, Japan, and Australia, raises important questions regarding the ethics of surgical innovation research in the field of UTx. This paper examines the current state of UTx in the context of the surgical innovation paradigm and IDEAL framework and discusses the ethical challenges faced by those considering the introduction of new trials. We argue that UTx remains an experimental procedure at a relatively early stage of the IDEAL framework, especially in the context of de novo trials, where protocols are likely to deviate from those used previously and where researchers are likely to have limited experience of UTx. We conclude that countries considering the introduction of UTx trials should build on the strengths of the reported outcomes to consolidate the evidence base and shed light on the uncertainties of the procedure. Authorities responsible for the ethical governance of UTx trials are advised to draw on the ethical framework used in the oversight of surgical innovation.

Indexed as

Infertility, FemaleOrgan TransplantationFemaleHumansJapanSwedenUterusMedical ethicsResearch ethicsSurgical innovationUterus transplantationVascular composite allografts

Identifiers

PMID37382845
PMCPMC10624705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.