Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37382812›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2024

The Misinformation Susceptibility Test (MIST): A psychometrically validated measure of news veracity discernment.

Rakoen Maertens, Friedrich M Götz, Hudson F Golino, Jon Roozenbeek, Claudia R Schneider, Yara Kyrychenko, John R Kerr, Stefan Stieger, William P McClanahan, Karly Drabot and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Susceptibility to online misinformation: A systematic meta-analysis of demographic and psychological factors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Susceptibility to Disinformation: A Data-Driven Typology Based on COVID-19 Hoaxes and Pro-Russian Propaganda.International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rakoen Maertens *Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EB, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK. rm938@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8507-5359
Friedrich M Götz *Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8900-6844
Hudson F GolinoUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1601-1447
Jon RoozenbeekDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EB, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8150-9305
Claudia R SchneiderDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EB, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6612-5186
Yara KyrychenkoDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EB, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0636-5046
John R KerrDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EB, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6606-5507
Stefan StiegerKarl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems an der Donau, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7784-6624
William P McClanahanDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EB, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6604-3842
Karly DrabotDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EB, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1769-8893
James HeDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EB, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1859-4914
Sander van der LindenDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EB, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0269-1744

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interest in the psychology of misinformation has exploded in recent years. Despite ample research, to date there is no validated framework to measure misinformation susceptibility. Therefore, we introduce Verification done, a nuanced interpretation schema and assessment tool that simultaneously considers Veracity discernment, and its distinct, measurable abilities (real/fake news detection), and biases (distrust/naïvité-negative/positive judgment bias). We then conduct three studies with seven independent samples (N

Indexed as

CommunicationJudgmentFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansLanguagePsychometricsAutomated item generationFake newsMisinformation susceptibilityNeural networksPsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID37382812
PMCPMC10991074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.