Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37382779›Full record

SynthesisPituitary2023

Efficacy and safety of cavernous sinus medial wall resection in pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and a single-arm meta-analysis.

Julia Pereira Muniz Pontes, Ofonime Chantal Udoma-Udofa, Jéssica Sales de Oliveira, Anna Laura Lima Larcipretti, Caroline Serafim Dagostin, Fernando Cotrim Gomes, Gabriela Borges Nager, Matheus de Andrade Bannach

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pituitary, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. High-Resolution MR Imaging of the Parasellar Ligaments.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia Pereira Muniz PontesDepartment of Surgical Specialties, Neurosurgery Teaching and Assistance Unit, Pedro Ernesto University Hospital, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. juliamunizpontes@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2603-245X
Ofonime Chantal Udoma-UdofaFaculty of Medicine, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7366-1550
Jéssica Sales de OliveiraFaculty of Medicine, National University of Rosario, Rosario, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2783-0122
Anna Laura Lima LarciprettiFaculty of Medicine, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Caroline Serafim DagostinFaculty of Medicine, University of the Extreme South of Santa Catarina, Criciúma, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5047-4023
Fernando Cotrim GomesFaculty of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0342-4207
Gabriela Borges NagerFaculty of Medicine, Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0604-4154
Matheus de Andrade BannachDepartment of Surgery, Neurology and Neurosurgery Unit, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil. bannachmatheus@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8047-7164
National University of Rosario · ARUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense · BRUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BRUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal de Ouro Preto · BRUniversidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPituitary adenomas, benign tumors, can lower quality of life. Pituitary adenomas that invade the medial wall and cavernous sinus (CS) indicate tumor recurrence and partial surgical excision. Despite the cavernous sinus's complexity and risks, new research has improved the surgical procedure and made excision safer. This comprehensive review and single-arm meta-analysis evaluates endocrinological remission and resection rates in pituitary adenomas to determine the benefits and risks of MWCS resection.

methodsDatabases were systematically searched for studies documenting the resection of the medial wall of the cavernous sinus. The primary outcome was endocrinological remission in patients who underwent resection of the MWCS.

resultsEight studies were included in the final analysis. The pooled proportion of endocrinological remission (ER) was 63.3%. The excision of MWCS pooled a gross total resection (GTR) proportion of 72.9%. Finally, ICA injury attained a pooled ratio of 0.5%, indicating minimal morbidity in the procedure.

conclusionThe cavernous sinus was ruled out, proving the MWCS excision is safe. Limiting population selection to Knosp 3A or lower enhanced GTR frequencies and lowered recurrence, according to subgroup analyses. This meta-analysis shows that MWCS resection can be a beneficial treatment option for pituitary tumors, when there is no macroscopic medial wall invasion and careful patient selection is done, especially for GH- and ACTH-producing tumors that can cause life-threatening metabolic changes.

Indexed as

AdenomaCavernous SinusPituitary NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeEndocrinological remissionEndoscopic endonasalMedial wall of cavernous sinusPituitary adenomaRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID37382779
OpenAlexW4382502481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.