Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37382744›Full record

SynthesisPhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2023

A systematic review of volumetric image guidance in proton therapy.

Mitchell Herrick, Scott Penfold, Alexandre Santos, Kevin Hickson

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Insights from initial experience for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with proton therapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mitchell HerrickDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia. Mitchell.herrick@sa.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9483-4409
Scott PenfoldDepartment of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Alexandre SantosDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
Kevin HicksonSA Medical Imaging, Adelaide, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, proton therapy centres have begun to shift from conventional 2D-kV imaging to volumetric imaging systems for image guided proton therapy (IGPT). This is likely due to the increased commercial interest and availability of volumetric imaging systems, as well as the shift from passively scattered proton therapy to intensity modulated proton therapy. Currently, there is no standard modality for volumetric IGPT, leading to variation between different proton therapy centres. This article reviews the reported clinical use of volumetric IGPT, as available in published literature, and summarises their utilisation and workflow where possible. In addition, novel volumetric imaging systems are also briefly summarised highlighting their potential benefits for IGPT and the challenges that need to be overcome before they can be used clinically.

Indexed as

Proton TherapyRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedDiagnostic ImagingProtonsProtonsAdaptive proton therapyImage-guided proton therapyIn-room imagingVolumetric image guidance

Identifiers

PMID37382744
PMCPMC10480289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.