Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37382696›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2023

Clinical and radiological results of final fusion in patients who underwent lengthening with magnetically controlled growing rods. About 66 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years.

Nicolas Mainard, Elie Saghbini, Tristan Langlais, Raphael Vialle, Eric Nectoux, Jerome Sales de Gauzy, Damien Fron, Federico Canavese

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nicolas MainardDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHU Lille, Avenue Eugène Avinée, 59000, Lille, France. nicolas.mainard@orange.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6403-2448
Elie SaghbiniOrthopaedic and Reconstructive Surgery in Children, Hôpital Armand-Trousseau - AP-HP, 26 Avenue du Docteur Arnold Netter, 75012, Paris, France.
Tristan LanglaisPaediatrics - Orthopaedic, Traumatological and Plastic Surgery, Children's Hospital, 330, Avenue de Grande Bretagne - TSA, 70034 - 31059, Toulouse, France.
Raphael VialleOrthopaedic and Reconstructive Surgery in Children, Hôpital Armand-Trousseau - AP-HP, 26 Avenue du Docteur Arnold Netter, 75012, Paris, France.
Eric NectouxDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHU Lille, Avenue Eugène Avinée, 59000, Lille, France.
Jerome Sales de GauzyPaediatrics - Orthopaedic, Traumatological and Plastic Surgery, Children's Hospital, 330, Avenue de Grande Bretagne - TSA, 70034 - 31059, Toulouse, France.
Damien FronDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHU Lille, Avenue Eugène Avinée, 59000, Lille, France.
Federico CanaveseDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHU Lille, Avenue Eugène Avinée, 59000, Lille, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRSorbonne Université · FRUniversité de Lille · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of definitive arthrodesis on frontal and sagittal spine balance in EOS patients treated with MCGR, as well as the complications associated with this procedure and the outcome at last follow-up.

methodsThis was a multicentre study in 10 French centres. All patients who underwent posterior spinal arthrodesis after completion of MCGR treatment, regardless of age, etiology of scoliosis between 2011 and 2022, were included.

resultsA total of 66 patients who had a final fusion after the lengthening programme were included in the study. The mean follow-up time was 5.5 ± 1.7 years (range: 2.1-9). The mean follow-up time after arthrodesis was 24 ± 18 months (range: 3-68) and the mean age at arthrodesis was 13.5 ± 1.5 years (range: 9.5-17). The main and secondary curves were significantly (p < 0.005 and p = 0.03) improved by arthrodesis (16.4° and 9° respectively) and stabilised at the last follow-up. The T1-T12 and T1-S1 distances increased by 8.4 mm and 14 mm with spinal fusion, with no significant difference (p = 0.096 and p = 0.068). There was no significant improvement in the rest of the parameters with arthrodesis, nor was there any significant deterioration at last follow-up. After final fusion, there were a total of 24 complications in 18 patients (27.3%) that routinely led to repeat surgery.

conclusionFinal fusion after MCGR provides satisfactory additional correction of the main and secondary curves and a moderate increase in the T1-T12 distance but has no impact on sagittal balance and other radiological parameters. The post-operative complication rate is particularly high in patients at risk of complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.

Indexed as

ScoliosisSpineAdolescentChildFollow-Up StudiesHumansRadiographyRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeEarly onset scoliosisGraduateMagnetically controlled growing rodPosterior spinal fusionSpinal growth

Identifiers

PMID37382696
OpenAlexW4382501845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.