Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37382345›Full record

Trial reportInternational wound journal2023

Efficacy of topical atorvastatin-loaded emulgel and nano-emulgel 1% on post-laparotomy pain and wound healing: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Fatemeh Saghafi, Vahid Ramezani, Jamal Jafari-Nedooshan, Javad Zarekamali, Saeed Kargar, Seyed Mostafa Tabatabaei, Adeleh Sahebnasagh

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International wound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Nanocomposites used in the treatment of skin lesions: a scoping review.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2024
    Article
  8. Statins-From Fungi to Pharmacy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fatemeh SaghafiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Yazd, Iran.
Vahid RamezaniDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and health services, Yazd, Iran.
Jamal Jafari-NedooshanDepartment of Surgery, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Yazd, Iran.
Javad ZarekamaliPharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and health services, Yazd, Iran.
Saeed KargarDepartment of Surgery, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Seyed Mostafa TabatabaeiDepartment of General Surgery, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Yazd, Iran.
Adeleh SahebnasaghClinical Research Center, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9361-1641
Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services · IRNorth Khorasan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to develop atorvastatin-loaded emulgel and nano-emulgel dosage forms and investigate their efficiency on surgical wound healing and reducing post-operative pain. This double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted in a surgical ward of a tertiary care hospital affiliated with university of medical sciences. The eligible patients were adults aged 18 years or older who were undergoing laparotomy. The participants were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three following groups of atorvastatin-loaded emulgel 1% (n = 20), atorvastatin-loaded nano-emulgel 1% (n = 20), and placebo emulgel (n = 20) twice a day for 14 days. The primary outcome was the Redness, Edema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, and Approximation (REEDA) scores to determine the rate of wound healing. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and quality of life were the secondary outcomes of this study. A total of 241 patients assessed for eligibility; of them, 60 patients completed the study and considered for final evaluation. A significant decrease in REEDA score was observed on Days 7 (63%) and 14 (93%) of treatment with atorvastatin nano-emulgel (p-value < 0.001). A significant decrease of 57% and 89% in REEDA score was reported at Days 7 and 14, respectively, in atorvastatin the emulgel group (p-value < 0.001). Reduction in pain VAS in the atorvastatin nano-emulgel was also recorded at Days 7 and 14 of the intervention. The results of the present study suggested that both topical atorvastatin-loaded emulgel and nano-emulgel 1% were effective in acceleration of wound healing and alleviation of pain of laparotomy surgical wounds, without causing intolerable side effects.

Indexed as

LaparotomyQuality of LifeAdultAtorvastatinDouble-Blind MethodHumansPostoperative PainWound HealingAtorvastatinatorvastatinemulgelnano-emulgelpost-laparotomy painsurgical wounds

Identifiers

PMID37382345
PMCPMC10681473
OpenAlexW4382501547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.