Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37382251›Full record

ReviewImmunity, inflammation and disease2023

Acceptance, availability, and feasibility of RTS, S/AS01 malaria vaccine: A review.

Hassan Mumtaz, Abdullah Nadeem, Wajeeha Bilal, Farrukh Ansar, Saira Saleem, Qaisar Ali Khan, Tamara Tango, Christopher Farkouh, Naod F Belay, Ravina Verma and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunity, inflammation and disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Current update on malaria in pregnancy: a systematic review.Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.

Hassan MumtazHealth Services Academy, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Abdullah NadeemDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Wajeeha BilalDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Farrukh AnsarKing Abdullah Teaching Hospital, Mansehra, Pakistan.
Saira SaleemMayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.
Qaisar Ali KhanDHQ and Teaching Hospital KDA Kohat, Kohat, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-8660-9551
Tamara TangoFaculty of Medicine Universitas, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Christopher FarkouhRush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Naod F BelayMichigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Ravina VermaSt. Georges University, Grenada, West Indies.
Matthew FarkouhPonce Health Sciences University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Muhammad SaqibKhyber Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-3645-6416
Dow University of Health Sciences · PKHealth Services Academy · PKKhyber Medical College · PKKhyber Teaching Hospital · PKKohat University of Science and Technology · PKMayo Hospital · PKMichigan State University · USPonce Health Sciences University · PRRush University Medical Center · USSt. George's University · GDUniversity of Indonesia · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn malaria-stricken regions, malaria continues to be one of the primary causes of mortality for children. The number of malaria-related fatalities has drastically decreased because of artemisinin-based pharmacological regimens.

methodsTwo independent researchers did a comprehensive literature search using PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar from its inception to September 2022.

resultsAfter evaluating RTS, S/AS01 for its safety, effectiveness, and feasibility, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) issued a favorable conclusion. It was suggested that the RTS, S malaria vaccine be used extensively by the World Health Organization on October 6, 2021. The successful pilot program testing the malaria vaccine in Ghana, Kenya, and Malawi served as the basis for this proposal.

conclusionSeveral challenges need to be addressed to ensure the success of vaccination programs. From the acceptability perspective, issues such as inadequate community engagement, concerns about side effects, and issues with the delivery and quality of healthcare services can affect the acceptance of the vaccine. From the feasibility standpoint, factors such as lack of transportation or long distances to healthcare facilities and the perception of completion of the vaccination calendar can affect the feasibility of the vaccine. Lastly, the availability of the vaccine is also a major concern as it may not be readily available to meet the demands.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsMalaria VaccinesChildFeasibility StudiesGhanaHumansKenyaMalaria VaccinesAS01malariaPlasmodiumRTS, Svaccine

Identifiers

PMID37382251
PMCPMC10266133
OpenAlexW4380682435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.