Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37382061›Full record

SynthesisJournal of biological rhythms2023

Meta-analysis of Diurnal Transcriptomics in Mouse Liver Reveals Low Repeatability of Rhythm Analyses.

Thomas G Brooks, Aditi Manjrekar, Antonijo Mrcˇela, Gregory R Grant

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of biological rhythms, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Single-Cell Multiomic Analysis of Circadian Rhythmicity in Mouse Liver.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Circadian Control of Protein Synthesis.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Liver as a nexus of daily metabolic cross talk.International review of cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Dominant constraints on the evolution of rhythmic gene expression.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas G BrooksInstitute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-6980-0079
Aditi ManjrekarDepartment of Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-4247-1527
Antonijo MrcˇelaInstitute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Gregory R GrantInstitute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Translational Therapeutics (United States) · USThe University of Texas at Dallas · US

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000003 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FITZGERALD, GARRET A · 2012 to 2015
$38.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the consistency of biological rhythms across studies, 57 public mouse liver tissue timeseries totaling 1096 RNA-seq samples were obtained and analyzed. Only the control groups of each study were included, to create comparable data. Technical factors in RNA-seq library preparation were the largest contributors to transcriptome-level differences, beyond biological or experiment-specific factors such as lighting conditions. Core clock genes were remarkably consistent in phase across all studies. Overlap of genes identified as rhythmic across studies was generally low, with no pair of studies having over 60% overlap. Distributions of phases of significant genes were remarkably inconsistent across studies, but the genes that consistently identified as rhythmic had acrophase clustering near ZT0 and ZT12. Despite the discrepancies between single-study analyses, cross-study analyses found substantial consistency. Running compareRhythms on each pair of studies identified a median of only 11% of the identified rhythmic genes as rhythmic in only 1 of the 2 studies. Data were integrated across studies in a joint and individual variance estimate (JIVE) analysis, which showed that the top 2 components of joint within-study variation are determined by time of day. A shape-invariant model with random effects was fit to the genes to identify the underlying shape of the rhythms, consistent across all studies, including identifying 72 genes with consistently multiple peaks.

Indexed as

Circadian ClocksCircadian RhythmAnimalsLiverMiceTranscriptomecircadianlivermeta-analysismousephase distributiontranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID37382061
PMCPMC10615793
OpenAlexW4382502241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.