Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37381625›Full record

ReviewBioengineered2023

Waste Valorization towards Industrial Products through Chemo- and Enzymatic- Hydrolysis.

Daniel Szopa, Dawid Skrzypczak, Grzegorz Izydorczyk, Katarzyna Chojnacka, Konstantinos Moustakas, Anna Witek-Krowiak

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineered, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel SzopaDepartment of Advanced Material Technologies, Faculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wroclaw, Poland.
Dawid SkrzypczakDepartment of Advanced Material Technologies, Faculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wroclaw, Poland.
Grzegorz IzydorczykDepartment of Advanced Material Technologies, Faculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wroclaw, Poland.
Katarzyna ChojnackaDepartment of Advanced Material Technologies, Faculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wroclaw, Poland.
Konstantinos MoustakasSchool of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-1301-2484
Anna Witek-KrowiakDepartment of Advanced Material Technologies, Faculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wroclaw, Poland.
Wrocław University of Science and Technology · PLNational Technical University of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper reviews the scientific literature on the latest technologies for treating waste by chemical hydrolysis, enzymatic hydrolysis and supporting processes. Particular attention is focused on wastes of biological origin, especially high-protein materials and those containing fats and sugars, as valuable components can be extracted from these recyclables to produce plant growth-stimulating compounds and animal feed, chemicals, biofuels or biopolymers. The wastes with the greatest potential were identified and the legislative regulations related to their processing were discussed. Chemical and enzymatic hydrolysis were compared and their main applications directions and important process parameters were indicated, as well as the need to optimize them in order to increase the efficiency of extraction of valuable components.

Indexed as

Animal FeedBiofuelsAnimalsHydrolysisPlant DevelopmentTechnologyBiofuelsamino acidchemicalenzymaticextractionfertilizerHydrolysis

Identifiers

PMID37381625
PMCPMC10312040
OpenAlexW4382501180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.