Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37381617›Full record

Observational studyAnaesthesia2023

Opioid analgesic effects on subjective well-being in the operating theatre.

M Eikemo, I M Meier, G E Løseth, M Trøstheim, N Ørstavik, E N Jensen, E L Garland, C Berna, G Ernst, S Leknes

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Anaesthesia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

M EikemoDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5103-919X
I M MeierDepartment of Physics and Computational Radiology, Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7606-1059
G E LøsethDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4178-3278
M TrøstheimDepartment of Physics and Computational Radiology, Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6021-6714
N ØrstavikDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
E N JensenDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4355-8912
E L GarlandCollege of Social Work, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
C BernaCenter for Integrative and Complementary Medicine, Division of Anaesthesiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8258-7412
G ErnstDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5224-0338
S LeknesDepartment of Physics and Computational Radiology, Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6667-4601
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NOThe Sense Innovation and Research CenterUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Targeting Hedonic Dysregulation to Address Chronic Pain and Opioid Misuse in Primary Care.R01DA042033 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GARLAND, ERIC LEE · 2016 to 2020
$2.8M
Neural mechanisms mediating appetitive regulation and smoking in nicotine addictionR01DA048094 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI FROELIGER, BRETT, GARLAND, ERIC LEE · 2019 to 2023
$2.2M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA042033NIDA NIH HHS R01DA042033NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048094NIDA NIH HHS R01DA048094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to opioid analgesics due to surgery increases the risk of new persistent opioid use. A mechanistic hypothesis for opioids' abuse liability rests on the belief that, in addition to pain relief, acute opioid treatment improves well-being (e.g. via euphoria) and relieves anxiety. However, opioids do not consistently improve mood in laboratory studies of healthy non-opioid users. This observational study determined how two commonly used opioid analgesics affected patients' subjective well-being in standard clinical practice. Day surgery patients rated how good and how anxious they felt before and after an open-label infusion of remifentanil (n = 159) or oxycodone (n = 110) in the operating theatre before general anaesthesia. One minute after drug injection, patients reported feeling intoxicated (> 6/10 points). Anxiety was reduced after opioids, but this anxiolytic effect was modest (remifentanil Cohen's d = 0.21; oxycodone d = 0.31). There was moderate to strong evidence against a concurrent improvement in well-being (Bayes factors > 6). After remifentanil, ratings of 'feeling good' were significantly reduced from pre-drug ratings (d = 0.28). After oxycodone, one in three participants felt better than pre-drug. Exploratory ordered logistic regressions revealed a link between previous opioid exposure and opioid effects on well-being, as only 14 of the 80 opioid-naïve patients reported feeling better after opioid injection. The odds of improved well-being ratings after opioids were higher in patients with previous opioid exposure and highest in patients with > 2 weeks previous opioid use (adjusted OR = 4.4). These data suggest that opioid-induced improvement of well-being is infrequent in opioid-naïve patients. We speculate that peri-operative exposure could increase risk of persistent use by rendering subsequent positive opioid effects on well-being more likely.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidOpioid-Related DisordersBayes TheoremHumansOxycodoneRemifentanilAnalgesics, OpioidOxycodoneRemifentanilaffectemotioneuphoriamoodpainreliefrewardwell-being

Identifiers

PMID37381617
PMCPMC10714491
OpenAlexW4382502737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.