Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37381589›Full record

SynthesisAddiction (Abingdon, England)2023

Effect of cognitive-behavioral techniques for problem gambling and gambling disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rory A Pfund, David P Forman, Shelby K Whalen, James M Zech, Meredith K Ginley, Samuel C Peter, Nicholas W McAfee, James P Whelan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Betting on change: An analysis of cognitive motivational behavior therapy versus referral to gamblers anonymous for gambling disorder.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2025
    Trial
  7. Testing the Efficacy of RESPONSIBLEPLAYInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Rory A PfundDepartment of Psychology, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9719-503X
David P FormanDepartment of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Shelby K WhalenDepartment of Psychology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, USA.
James M ZechDepartment of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8726-1884
Meredith K GinleyTennessee Institute for Gambling Education & Research, Tennessee, USA.
Samuel C PeterDurham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Nicholas W McAfeeDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA.
James P WhelanDepartment of Psychology, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2245-6450
East Tennessee State University · USTennessee Department of Education · USColumbia University · USDurham VA Medical Center · USJackson Memorial Hospital · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

Alcohol Research Training: Methods & MechanismsT32AA018108 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI Katie A Witkiewitz · 2010 to 2026
$5.6M
NIAAA NIH HHS L30 AA029551NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA018108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo measure the effect of cognitive-behavioral techniques (CBTs) on gambling disorder severity and gambling behavior at post-treatment and follow-up.

methodSeven databases and two clinical trial registries were searched to identify peer-reviewed studies and unpublished studies of randomized controlled trials. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool assessed risk of bias in the included studies. A random effect meta-analysis with robust variance estimation was conducted to measure the effect of CBTs relative to minimally treated or no treatment control groups.

resultsTwenty-nine studies representing 3991 participants were identified. CBTs significantly reduced gambling disorder severity (g = -1.14, 95% CI = -1.68, -0.60, 95% prediction interval [PI] = -2.97, 0.69), gambling frequency (g = -0.54, 95% CI = -0.80, -0.27, 95% PI = -1.48, 0.40) and gambling intensity (g = -0.32, 95% CI = -0.51, -0.13, 95% PI = -0.76, 0.12) at post-treatment relative to control. CBTs had no significant effect on follow-up outcomes. Analyses supported the presence of publication bias and high heterogeneity in effect size estimates.

conclusionsCognitive-behavioral techniques are a promising treatment for reducing gambling disorder and gambling behavior; however, the effect of cognitive-behavioral techniques on gambling disorder severity and gambling frequency and intensity at post-treatment is overestimated, and cognitive-behavioral techniques may not be reliably efficacious for all individuals seeking treatment for problem gambling and gambling disorder.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyGamblingBiasFollow-Up StudiesHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReproducibility of ResultsTreatment Outcomecognitive-behavioral therapyefficacygamblingmeta-analysissystematic reviewtreatment

Identifiers

PMID37381589
PMCPMC10524575
OpenAlexW4382501344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.