SynthesisInternational wound journal2023
Effect of various repositioning regimens on pressure wound ulcer occurrence in at-risk adult persons without existing pressure wound ulcers: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International wound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of various repositioning regimens on pressure wound ulcer occurrence in at-risk adult persons without existing pressure wound ulcers: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2023Pooled it
- RETRACTION: Effect of Various Repositioning Regimens on Pressure Wound Ulcer Occurrence in At-Risk Adult Persons Without Existing Pressure Wound Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis.International wound journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-01-12Author Unresponsive · Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meta-analysis research was implemented to appraise the effect of various repositioning regimens (RRs) on pressure wound ulcer (PWU) occurrence in at-risk adult persons without existing PWUs. Inclusive literature research till April 2023 was done and 1197 interconnected researches were revised. The 15 picked researches, enclosed 8510 at-risk adult persons without existing PWUs persons were in the utilised researchers' starting point, 1002 of them were utilising repositioning, 1069 were control, 3443 were utilising 2-<4 h repositioning and 2994 were utilising 4-6 h repositioning. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were utilised to appraise the consequence of various RRs on PWU occurrence in at-risk adult persons without existing PWUs by the dichotomous approach and a fixed or random model. Repositioning had significantly lower PWU (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.32-0.73, p < 0.001) compared to control in at-risk adult persons without existing PWUs persons. 2-<4 h repositioning had significantly lower PWU (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.90, p = 0.01) compared to 4-6 h repositioning in at-risk adult persons without existing PWUs persons. Repositioning had significantly lower PWU compared to control in at-risk adult persons without existing PWU persons. 2-<4 h repositioning had significantly lower PWU compared to 4-6 h repositioning in at-risk adult persons without existing PWUs persons. However, caution needs to be taken when interacting with its values since there was a low sample size of some of the chosen research found for the comparisons in the meta-analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.