Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37381063›Full record

ArticleIMA fungus2023

Validation of Fuscoporia (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) ITS sequences and five new species based on multi-marker phylogenetic and morphological analyses.

Yoonhee Cho, Dohye Kim, Yoongil Lee, Juhwan Jeong, Shahid Hussain, Young Woon Lim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IMA fungus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Morphological and Phylogenetic Analyses Reveal Four New Species ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Three new species ofMycoKeys · 2025
    Article
  7. Fungal Planet description sheets: 1697-1780.Fungal systematics and evolution · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The first complete mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yoonhee ChoSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Microbiology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dohye KimSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Microbiology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yoongil LeeSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Microbiology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Juhwan JeongSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Microbiology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Shahid HussainCentre for Plant Sciences and Biodiversity, University of Swat, Swat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Young Woon LimSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Microbiology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. ywlim@snu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2864-3449

Funding

National Institute of Biological Resources NIBR202203112National Research Foundation (KR) NRF-2020K2A9A2A06047605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although there is a continuous increase in available molecular data, not all sequence identities in public databases are always properly verified and managed. Here, the sequences available in GenBank for Fuscoporia (Hymenochaetales) were validated. Many morphological characters of Fuscoporia overlap among the species, emphasizing the role of molecular identification for accuracy. The identities of 658 Fuscoporia GenBank internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences were assessed using ITS phylogeny, revealing 109 (16.6%) misidentified and 196 (29.8%) unspecified sequences. They were validated and re-identified based on the research articles they were published in and, if unpublished, based on sequences from the type, type locality-derived sequences, or otherwise reliable sequences. To enhance the resolution of species delimitation, a phylogenetic assessment of a multi-marker dataset (ITS + nrLSU + rpb2 + tef1) was conducted. The multi-marker phylogeny resolved five of the twelve species complexes found in the ITS phylogeny and uncovered five new Fuscoporia species: F. dolichoseta, F. gilvoides, F. koreana, F. reticulata, and F. semicephala. The validated ITS sequences in this study may prevent further accumulation of misidentified sequences in public databases and contribute to a more accurate taxonomic evaluation of Fuscoporia species.

Indexed as

AnnotationFive new taxaHymenochaetaceaeITSMolecular identificationPhellinus

Identifiers

PMID37381063
PMCPMC10308793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.