Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37381008›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2023

Human-centered visualization technologies for patient monitoring are the future: a narrative review.

Greta Gasciauskaite, Justyna Lunkiewicz, Tadzio R Roche, Donat R Spahn, Christoph B Nöthiger, David W Tscholl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Digital twins for chronic lung diseases.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Greta GasciauskaiteInstitute of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Justyna LunkiewiczInstitute of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Tadzio R RocheInstitute of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Donat R SpahnInstitute of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christoph B NöthigerInstitute of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
David W TschollInstitute of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. david.tscholl@usz.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical technology innovation has improved patient monitoring in perioperative and intensive care medicine and continuous improvement in the technology is now a central focus in this field. Because data density increases with the number of parameters captured by patient-monitoring devices, its interpretation has become more challenging. Therefore, it is necessary to support clinicians in managing information overload while improving their awareness and understanding about the patient's health status. Patient monitoring has almost exclusively operated on the single-sensor-single-indicator principle-a technology-centered way of presenting data in which specific parameters are measured and displayed individually as separate numbers and waves. An alternative is user-centered medical visualization technology, which integrates multiple pieces of information (e.g., vital signs), derived from multiple sensors into a single indicator-an avatar-based visualization-that is a meaningful representation of the real-world situation. Data are presented as changing shapes, colors, and animation frequencies, which can be perceived, integrated, and interpreted much more efficiently than other formats (e.g., numbers). The beneficial effects of these technologies have been confirmed in computer-based simulation studies; visualization technologies improved clinicians' situation awareness by helping them effectively perceive and verbalize the underlying medical issue, while improving diagnostic confidence and reducing workload. This review presents an overview of the scientific results and the evidence for the validity of these technologies.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsMonitoring, PhysiologicTechnologyAwarenessHumansPatient SafetyPerioperative MedicineIntensive care unitPatient monitoringPatient safetyPerioperative medicineSituation awarenessUser-centered designVisualization technologies

Identifiers

PMID37381008
PMCPMC10308796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.