Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37380979›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Good practice recommendations on implementation evaluation for policies targeting diet, physical activity, and sedentary behaviour.

Janine Wendt, Daniel A Scheller, Anna Banik, Aleksandra Luszczynska, Sarah Forberger, Hajo Zeeb, Marie Scheidmeir, Thomas Kubiak, Nanna Lien, Biljana Meshkovska and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Development of the Physical Activity Research Opportunities (PARO) framework.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025
    Article
  4. Feasibility of a targeted nutrition-risk screening tool in Australian mental health services: The NutriMental screener.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Janine WendtDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Daniel A SchellerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Anna BanikDepartment of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Wroclaw, Poland.
Aleksandra LuszczynskaDepartment of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Wroclaw, Poland.
Sarah ForbergerLeibniz-Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Hajo ZeebLeibniz-Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Marie ScheidmeirHealth Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Thomas KubiakHealth Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Nanna LienDepartment of Nutrition, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Biljana MeshkovskaDepartment of Nutrition, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Karolina LobczowskaDepartment of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Wroclaw, Poland.
Piotr RomaniukDepartment of Health Policy, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Agnieszka Neumann-PodczaskaDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Katarzyna Wieczorowska-TobisDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Jürgen M SteinackerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Annabel S Mueller-StierlinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany. annabel.mueller-stierlin@uni-ulm.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health policies aim to achieve specific health goals through system-level changes, unlike common health interventions that focus on promoting specific health behaviors on individual level. However, reliable data on the feasibility and implementation of policy actions across Europe are lacking. Moreover, no practice-oriented guidance exists for policy makers and implementers on how to evaluate policy implementation.As part of the Policy Evaluation Network, we aimed to synthesise knowledge on how to evaluate the implementation of policies promoting healthy diets, physical activity, and reducing sedentary behaviours. The multidisciplinary working group comprised 16 researchers and conducted two scoping reviews, three systematic reviews, two meta-reviews, two qualitative case studies and one quantitative case study over three years. The target populations included the general population, those at risk for obesity, and school children. Based on these reviews and case studies, this article summarises and presents the findings and lessons learned regarding the implementation evaluation of policies in nine case reports.Drawing on these experiences, three critical requirements for policy implementation evaluation were set: 1) conduct a comprehensive policy implementation evaluation from a multi-level perspective, 2) use implementation frameworks to address processes, determinants, and outcomes, and 3) engage relevant stakeholders in policy implementation evaluation. Finally, the consensus process resulted in 10 steps for the implementation evaluation of policies to promote physical activity and a healthy diet and to reduce sedentary behaviours, which adhere to the requirements and resources of the targeted policy.The findings of an implementation evaluation can lead to a better understanding of why policies work or not and can serve as a basis for developing solutions. This practice-oriented guidance outlines factors that should be considered in policy implementation evaluation to address its complexity. In this way, involved researchers and practitioners are empowered to engage in the evaluation process to close the knowledge gap regarding policy implementation.

Indexed as

DietSedentary BehaviorChildDiet, HealthyExerciseHealth PolicyHumansEvaluationHealth promotionImplementationLifestylePolicy

Identifiers

PMID37380979
PMCPMC10308765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.