ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2023
Deep learning-aided extraction of outer aortic surface from CT angiography scans of patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection.
Article in European radiology experimental, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep Learning Based on DeepLabv3+ for Automated Identification, Segmentation, and Quantification of Fungi in Clinical Fluorescence Microscopy Images.Mycopathologia · 2026Article
- Neural network assessment of aortic, iliac, renal, and mesenteric artery calcification in CTA: Normalized scoring framework and comparison to threshold-based method.Acta radiologica open · 2026Article
- Bridging macro bibliometrics and micro molecular mechanisms: an integrated analysis of global aortic dissection research.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Performance of image-based deep learning models for aortic dissection segmentation and diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Automated AI detection of thoracic aortic dissection on CT imaging.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- Automated detection of wrist ganglia in MRI using convolutional neural networks.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- A Fully Automatic Pipeline of Identification, Segmentation, and Subtyping of Aortic Dissection from CT Angiography.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-powered solutions for automated aortic diameter measurement in computed tomography: a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2024Review
- Enhancing Radiologist Efficiency with AI: A Multi-Reader Multi-Case Study on Aortic Dissection Detection and Prioritization.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Automatic segmentation of extensor carpi ulnaris tendon and detection of tendinosis with convolutional neural networks.Acta radiologica open · 2024Article
- Revolutionising Acute Cardiac Care With Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Challenges.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGuidelines recommend that aortic dimension measurements in aortic dissection should include the aortic wall. This study aimed to evaluate two-dimensional (2D)- and three-dimensional (3D)-based deep learning approaches for extraction of outer aortic surface in computed tomography angiography (CTA) scans of Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) patients and assess the speed of different whole aorta (WA) segmentation approaches.
methodsA total of 240 patients diagnosed with TBAD between January 2007 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed for this study; 206 CTA scans from 206 patients with acute, subacute, or chronic TBAD acquired with various scanners in multiple different hospital units were included. Ground truth (GT) WAs for 80 scans were segmented by a radiologist using an open-source software. The remaining 126 GT WAs were generated via semi-automatic segmentation process in which an ensemble of 3D convolutional neural networks (CNNs) aided the radiologist. Using 136 scans for training, 30 for validation, and 40 for testing, 2D and 3D CNNs were trained to automatically segment WA. Main evaluation metrics for outer surface extraction and segmentation accuracy were normalized surface Dice (NSD) and Dice coefficient score (DCS), respectively.
results2D CNN outperformed 3D CNN in NSD score (0.92 versus 0.90, p = 0.009), and both CNNs had equal DCS (0.96 versus 0.96, p = 0.110). Manual and semi-automatic segmentation times of one CTA scan were approximately 1 and 0.5 h, respectively.
conclusionsBoth CNNs segmented WA with high DCS, but based on NSD, better accuracy may be required before clinical application. CNN-based semi-automatic segmentation methods can expedite the generation of GTs. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Deep learning can speeds up the creation of ground truth segmentations. CNNs can extract the outer aortic surface in patients with type B aortic dissection. KEY POINTS: • 2D and 3D convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can extract the outer aortic surface accurately. • Equal Dice coefficient score (0.96) was reached with 2D and 3D CNNs. • Deep learning can expedite the creation of ground truth segmentations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.