Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37380806›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2023

Deep learning-aided extraction of outer aortic surface from CT angiography scans of patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection.

Risto Kesävuori, Tuomas Kaseva, Eero Salli, Peter Raivio, Sauli Savolainen, Marko Kangasniemi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Risto KesävuoriDepartment of Radiology, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, FI-00290, Helsinki, Finland. risto.kesavuori@hus.fi.ORCID 0000-0002-1020-0271
Tuomas KasevaDepartment of Radiology, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, FI-00290, Helsinki, Finland.
Eero SalliDepartment of Radiology, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, FI-00290, Helsinki, Finland.
Peter RaivioDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Sauli SavolainenDepartment of Radiology, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, FI-00290, Helsinki, Finland.
Marko KangasniemiDepartment of Radiology, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, FI-00290, Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuidelines recommend that aortic dimension measurements in aortic dissection should include the aortic wall. This study aimed to evaluate two-dimensional (2D)- and three-dimensional (3D)-based deep learning approaches for extraction of outer aortic surface in computed tomography angiography (CTA) scans of Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) patients and assess the speed of different whole aorta (WA) segmentation approaches.

methodsA total of 240 patients diagnosed with TBAD between January 2007 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed for this study; 206 CTA scans from 206 patients with acute, subacute, or chronic TBAD acquired with various scanners in multiple different hospital units were included. Ground truth (GT) WAs for 80 scans were segmented by a radiologist using an open-source software. The remaining 126 GT WAs were generated via semi-automatic segmentation process in which an ensemble of 3D convolutional neural networks (CNNs) aided the radiologist. Using 136 scans for training, 30 for validation, and 40 for testing, 2D and 3D CNNs were trained to automatically segment WA. Main evaluation metrics for outer surface extraction and segmentation accuracy were normalized surface Dice (NSD) and Dice coefficient score (DCS), respectively.

results2D CNN outperformed 3D CNN in NSD score (0.92 versus 0.90, p = 0.009), and both CNNs had equal DCS (0.96 versus 0.96, p = 0.110). Manual and semi-automatic segmentation times of one CTA scan were approximately 1 and 0.5 h, respectively.

conclusionsBoth CNNs segmented WA with high DCS, but based on NSD, better accuracy may be required before clinical application. CNN-based semi-automatic segmentation methods can expedite the generation of GTs. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Deep learning can speeds up the creation of ground truth segmentations. CNNs can extract the outer aortic surface in patients with type B aortic dissection. KEY POINTS: • 2D and 3D convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can extract the outer aortic surface accurately. • Equal Dice coefficient score (0.96) was reached with 2D and 3D CNNs. • Deep learning can expedite the creation of ground truth segmentations.

Indexed as

Aortic DissectionDeep LearningAortaComputed Tomography AngiographyHumansRetrospective StudiesAortic dissectionComputed tomography angiographyConvolutional neural networkMachine learningNeural networks (computer)

Identifiers

PMID37380806
PMCPMC10307760
OpenAlexW4382358571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.