ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2023
High ligation versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a retrospective study on surgical and long-term outcome.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer surgery, there has been controversy to whether the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) should be ligated at the origin of its aorta (high ligation (HL)) or below the branches of the left colonic artery (LCA) (low ligation (LL)). This study was intended to clarify oncological outcome and long-term prognosis of retrospective analysis.
methodsAnalyzed the cases who underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR) in Shanghai Ruijin Hospital from January 2015 to December 2016, 357patients scheduled into 2 groups according to the level of IMA ligation: HL (n = 247) versus LL (n = 110).
resultsThe primary endpoint is long-term outcomes, and the secondary endpoint is the incidence rate of major postoperative complications. There were no significant differences in 5-year overall survival (P = 0.92) and 5-year disease-free survival (P = 0.41). There were no differences between the clinical baseline levels in each group. The incidence of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in the two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.037). No significant differences were observed in operative time (P = 0.092) and intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.118). In the HL group, 6 cases (2.4%) had additional colonic excision due to poor anastomotic blood supply; none of the colonic anastomosis in the low ligation group had ischemic manifestations, and length from the proximal margin (P = 0.076), length from the distal margin (P = 0.184), the total number of lymph nodes excised (P = 0.065), and anastomotic leakage incidence (P = 0.33).
conclusionLow ligation of the IMA which reserved LCA with vascular root lymph node dissection in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer surgery may help protect the blood supply of the anastomosis, and will not increase postoperative complications while enhance recovery, without compromising radical excision and long-term prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.