Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37380743›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2024

Insight in cognitive impairment assessed with the Cognitive Assessment Interview in a large sample of patients with schizophrenia.

Paola Bucci, Armida Mucci, Giulia M Giordano, Edoardo Caporusso, Luigi Giuliani, Dino Gibertoni, Alessandro Rossi, Paola Rocca, Alessandro Bertolino, Silvana Galderisi and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Paola BucciDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Armida MucciDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Giulia M GiordanoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy. giuliamgiordano@gmail.com.
Edoardo CaporussoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Luigi GiulianiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Dino GibertoniResearch and Innovation Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Alessandro RossiSection of Psychiatry, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Paola RoccaDepartment of Neuroscience, Section of Psychiatry, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Alessandro BertolinoDepartment of Basic Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', Bari, Italy.
Silvana GalderisiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
on the behalf of the Italian Network for Research on Psychoses
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of L'Aquila · ITAzienda USL di Bologna · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Cognitive Assessment Interview (CAI) is an interview-based scale measuring cognitive impairment and its impact on functioning in subjects with schizophrenia (SCZ). The present study aimed at assessing, in a large sample of SCZ (n = 601), the agreement between patients and their informants on CAI ratings, to explore patients' insight in their cognitive deficits and its relationships with clinical and functional indices. Agreement between patient- and informant-based ratings was assessed by the Gwet's agreement coefficient. Predictors of insight in cognitive deficits were explored by stepwise multiple regression analyses. Patients reported lower severity of cognitive impairment vs. informants. A substantial to almost perfect agreement was observed between patients' and informants' ratings. Lower insight in cognitive deficits was associated to greater severity of neurocognitive impairment and positive symptoms, lower severity of depressive symptoms, and older age. Worse real-life functioning was associated to lower insight in cognitive deficit, worse neurocognitive performance, and worse functional capacity. Our findings indicate that the CAI is a valid co-primary measure with the interview to patients providing a reliable assessment of their cognitive deficits. In the absence of informants with good knowledge of the subject, the interview to the patient may represent a valid alternative.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionInterview, PsychologicalSchizophreniaAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSchizophrenic PsychologyYoung AdultCognitive impairmentCo-primary measureFunctioningInsightSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID37380743
PMCPMC11362188
OpenAlexW4382359861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.