Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37380617›Full record

ArticleThe Milbank quarterly2023

Advancing Dialogue About Consent and Molecular HIV Surveillance in the United States: Four Proposals Following a Federal Advisory Panel's Call for Major Reforms.

Stephen Molldrem, Anthony K J Smith, Alexander McCLELLAND

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Milbank quarterly, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Molecular HIV Surveillance: Beyond Cluster Detection and Response.AIDS research and human retroviruses · 2025
    Article
  6. Action needed to address molecular HIV surveillance ethical concerns.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephen MolldremInstitute for Bioethics and Health Humanities, University of Texas Medical Branch.ORCID 0000-0002-1907-8081
Anthony K J SmithCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney.ORCID 0000-0002-0005-9542
Alexander McCLELLANDInstitute of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Carleton University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Policy Points Molecular HIV surveillance and cluster detection and response (MHS/CDR) programs have been a core public health activity in the United States since 2018 and are the "fourth pillar" of the Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative launched in 2019. MHS/CDR has caused controversy, including calls for a moratorium from networks of people living with HIV. In October 2022, the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS (PACHA) adopted a resolution calling for major reforms. We analyze the policy landscape and present four proposals to federal stakeholders pertaining to PACHA's recommendations about incorporating opt-outs and plain-language notifications into MHS/CDR programs.

Indexed as

Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeHIV InfectionsHIVHumansInformed ConsentPublic HealthUnited Statescluster detection and responseEnding the HIV Epidemicmolecular HIV surveillancepublic health ethics

Identifiers

PMID37380617
PMCPMC10726778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.