ReviewClinical breast cancer2023
A Review of AI-Based Radiomics and Computational Pathology Approaches in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Current Applications and Perspectives.
Review in Clinical breast cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating tumor habitat heterogeneity with a hybrid deep learning architecture for ultrasound radiomics: a dual-center study on non-invasive prediction of PD-L1 expression in triple-negative breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- A novel multimodal framework integrating pathomics, deep learning, and machine learning for breast cancer histological grades classification.Diagnostic pathology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for triple-negative breast cancer from imaging to multi-omics.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Emerging Approaches in Breast Cancer: From Molecular Mechanisms to Diagnosis and Therapeutic Strategies.Oncology research · 2026Review
- The role of AI-driven decision support in immunotherapy for predicting pathological complete response in triple-negative breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Radiomics-integrated machine learning framework for quantitative breast cancer diagnosis.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- AI-mediated ultrasound radiomics in the diagnosis and treatment of triple-negative breast cancer: research progress and future challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Radiomic Characterization and Automated Classification of Drusen Substructure Phenotype Associated with High-Risk Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Machine learning model for predicting epidermal growth factor receptor expression status in breast cancer using ultrasound radiomics.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Advanced deep learning and transfer learning approaches for breast cancer classification using advanced multi-line classifiers and datasets with model optimization and interpretability.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Triple-Negative Breast Cancer on the Rise: Breakthroughs and Beyond.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2025Review
- Deep Learning and Radiomics in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Predicting Long-Term Prognosis and Clinical Outcomes.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment: Advances in Imaging, Pathology, and Personalized Care.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Radiologic imaging biomarkers in triple-negative breast cancer: a literature review about the role of artificial intelligence and the way forward.BJR artificial intelligence · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the most common and deadly cancers worldwide. Approximately, 20% of all breast cancers are characterized as triple negative (TNBC). TNBC typically is associated with a poorer prognosis relative to other breast cancer subtypes. Due to its aggressiveness and lack of response to hormonal therapy, conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy is the usual treatment; however, this treatment is not always effective, and an important percentage of patients develop recurrence. More recently, immunotherapy has started to be used on some populations with TNBC showing promising results. Unfortunately, immunotherapy is only applicable to a minority of patients and responses in metastatic TNBC have overall been modest in comparison to other cancer types. This situation evidences the need for developing effective biomarkers that help to stratify and personalize patient management. Thanks to recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), there has been an increasing interest in its use for medical applications aiming at supporting clinical decision making. Several works have used AI in combination with diagnostic medical imaging, more specifically radiology and digitized histopathological tissue samples, aiming to extract disease-specific information that is difficult to quantify by the human eye. These works have demonstrated that analysis of such images in the context of TNBC has great potential for (1) risk-stratifying patients to identify those patients who are more likely to experience disease recurrence or die from the disease and (2) predicting pathologic complete response. In this manuscript, we present an overview on AI and its integration with radiology and histopathological images for developing prognostic and predictive approaches for TNBC. We present state of the art approaches in the literature and discuss the opportunities and challenges with developing AI algorithms regarding further development and clinical deployment, including identifying those patients who may benefit from certain treatments (e.g., adjuvant chemotherapy) from those who may not and thereby should be directed toward other therapies, discovering potential differences between populations, and identifying disease subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.