Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37380217›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society2023

A phase I study of the Wee1 kinase inhibitor adavosertib (AZD1775) in combination with chemoradiation in cervical, upper vaginal, and uterine cancers.

Eduardo Gonzalez-Ochoa, Michael Milosevic, Bradley Corr, James L Abbruzzese, Eugenia Girda, Rachel W Miller, Jennifer Croke, Helen Mackay, Yeh Chen Lee, Valerie Bowering and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Targeting WEE1 Kinase in Gynecological Malignancies.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Eduardo Gonzalez-OchoaDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1056-5967
Michael MilosevicDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Bradley CorrDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
James L AbbruzzeseDivision of Medical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Eugenia GirdaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Rachel W MillerDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Jennifer CrokeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Helen MackayDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Yeh Chen LeeUniversity of New South Wales Prince of Wales Clinical School, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Valerie BoweringDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Janelle RamsahaiDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lisa WangDepartment of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
April D'SouzaDrug Development Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Charles A KunosNational Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Amit M OzaDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Stephanie LheureuxDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Stephanie.Lheureux@uhn.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-9955-1245
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre · CADuke Medical Center · USNational Cancer Institute · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Kentucky · USUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

The Johns Hopkins Translational Science Team for the ET-CTNUM1CA186691 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Jan Hendrik Beumer, Michael A Carducci · 2014 to 2026
$21.9M
Princess Margaret Phase I Consorium (PMP1C)UM1CA186644 · NCI · UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK · PI Philippe Bedard, Kevin D Courtney · 2014 to 2026
$16.6M
NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186644NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWee1 kinase is a crucial regulator of the G2/M checkpoint which prevents entry of damaged DNA into mitosis. Adavosertib (AZD1775), a selective inhibitor of Wee1, induces G2 escape and increases cytotoxicity when combined with DNA damaging agents. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adavosertib in combination with definitive pelvic radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin in patients with gynecological cancers.

methodsA multi-institutional, open-label phase I trial was designed to assess dose escalation (3+3 design) of adavosertib in combination with standard chemoradiation. Eligible patients with locally advanced cervical, endometrial or vaginal tumors were treated with a 5-week course of pelvic external beam radiation 45-50 Gy in 1.8-2 Gy daily fractions plus concurrent weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m

resultsTen patients were enrolled (nine locally advanced cervical and one endometrial cancer). Two patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity at dose level 1 (adavosertib 100 mg by mouth daily on days 1, 3 and 5), including one patient with grade 4 thrombocytopenia, and one with treatment hold >1 week due to grade 1 creatinine elevation and grade 1 thrombocytopenia. At dose level -1 (adavosertib 100 mg by mouth daily on days 3 and 5), one out of five patients enrolled had a dose-limiting toxicity in the form of persistent grade 3 diarrhea. The overall response rate at 4 months was 71.4%, including four complete responses. At 2 years follow-up, 86% of patients were alive and progression-free.

conclusionThe recommended phase II dose could not be determined due to clinical toxicity and early trial closure. Preliminary efficacy appears promising, yet selecting the adequate dose/schedule in combination chemoradiation warrants further investigation to limit overlapping toxicities.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsThrombocytopeniaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCisplatinFemaleHumansProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrazolesPyrimidinonesadavosertibAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrazolesPyrimidinonesCervical CancerRadiotherapyUterine Cancer

Identifiers

PMID37380217
PMCPMC10711936
OpenAlexW4382396967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.