Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37380202›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Palliative care in the treatment of women with breast cancer: a scoping review protocol.

Romel Jonathan Velasco Yanez, Ana Fátima Carvalho Fernandes, Samuel Miranda Mattos, Thereza Maria Magalhães Moreira, Régia Christina Moura Barbosa Castro, Erilaine de Freitas Corpes, Luís Carlos Lopes-Júnior

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Romel Jonathan Velasco YanezNursing Department, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6969-8318
Ana Fátima Carvalho FernandesNursing Department, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Samuel Miranda MattosNursing Department, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Thereza Maria Magalhães MoreiraNursing Department, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1424-0649
Régia Christina Moura Barbosa CastroNursing Department, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Erilaine de Freitas CorpesNursing Department, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Luís Carlos Lopes-JúniorNursing Department, Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo, Vitoria, Brazil lopesjr.lc@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2424-6510
Universidade Federal do Ceará · BRUniversidade Estadual do Ceará · BRUniversidade Federal do Espírito Santo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCurrently, breast cancer ranks first among female malignancies; hence, there are strong recommendations for the early inclusion of these patients in palliative care. Palliative care aims to alleviate symptoms improving the quality of life of dying patients, an essential component of breast cancer care. This study aimed to map and synthesise the available evidence on palliative care for women with breast cancer and to discuss the review results with stakeholders.

methodsA scoping review protocol is presented in this article, consisting of two phases. In the first phase, a scoping review study will be conducted adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines and guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Nine databases, an electronic repository, a trial register website, grey literature and additional sources will be searched. A focus group discussion with six stakeholders will occur in the second phase. The analysis will be performed through inductive and manifest content analysis using the IRaMuTeQ V.0.7 alpha software. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The scoping review protocol did not require ethical approval. However, the study's second phase has been approved by the institutional review board of Maternidade Escola Assis Chateaubriand/MEAC/UFC. The findings will be disseminated through professional networks, conference presentations and publications.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsHospice and Palliative Care NursingBreastFemaleHumansPalliative CareQuality of LifeScoping Reviews as TopicAdult palliative careBreast tumoursONCOLOGYPALLIATIVE CARE

Identifiers

PMID37380202
PMCPMC10410954
OpenAlexW4382361672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.