Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37380149›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer assisted tomography

High Spatial-Resolution Skull Base Imaging With Photon-Counting Computed Tomography and Energy-Integrating Computed Tomography: A Comparative Phantom Study.

Jayasai R Rajagopal, Fides R Schwartz, Justin B Solomon, David S Enterline, Ehsan Samei

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer assisted tomography. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical applications of portable CT scanners.The British journal of radiology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jayasai R Rajagopal
Fides R SchwartzDuke University Health System, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Justin B SolomonFrom the Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Medical Physics Graduate Program, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
David S EnterlineDuke University Health System, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Ehsan SameiFrom the Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Medical Physics Graduate Program, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University Health System · USNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center · US

Funding

TR&D Project 3: Virtual ReadersP41EB028744 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Ehsan Samei · 2021 to 2026
$7.8M
Simulation Tools for Dynamic CTR01EB001838 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SAMEI, EHSAN, SEGARS, WILLIAM P · 2005 to 2023
$6.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB028744NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractPhoton-counting computed tomography (PCCT) offers better high-resolution and noise performance than energy integrating detector (EID) CT. In this work, we compared both technologies for imaging of the temporal bone and skull base. A clinical PCCT system and 3 clinical EID CT scanners were used to image the American College of Radiology image quality phantom using a clinical imaging protocol with matched CTDI vol (CT dose index-volume) of 25 mGy. Images were used to characterize the image quality of each system across a series of high-resolution reconstruction options. Noise was calculated from the noise power spectrum, whereas resolution was quantified with a bone insert by calculating a task transfer function. Images of an anthropomorphic skull phantom and 2 patient cases were examined for visualization of small anatomical structures. Across measured conditions, PCCT had a comparable or smaller average noise magnitude (120 Hounsfield units [HU]) to the EID systems (144-326 HU). Photon-counting CT also had comparable resolution (task transfer function f25 : 1.60 mm -1 ) to the EID systems (1.34-1.77 mm -1 ). Imaging results supported quantitative findings as PCCT more clearly showed the 12-lp/cm bars from the fourth section of the American College of Radiology phantom and better represented the vestibular aqueduct and oval and round windows when compared with the EID scanners. A clinical PCCT system was able to image the temporal bone and skull base with improved spatial resolution and lower noise than clinical EID CT systems at matched dose.

Indexed as

HeadTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansPhantoms, ImagingPhotonsSkull BaseTomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID37380149
PMCPMC10356746
OpenAlexW4382365265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.