Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37379811›Full record

ArticleStereotactic and functional neurosurgery2023

Improvement in Intraoperative Image Quality in Transcranial Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery Using Transmitter Gain Adjustment.

Hiroki Hori, Yusuke Yamada, Masayuki Nakano, Takahiro Ouchi, Masahito Takasaki, Ken Iijima, Takaomi Taira, Keiichi Abe, Hirokazu Iwamuro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hiroki HoriDepartment of FUS Center, Moriyama Neurosurgical Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke YamadaDepartment of Radiology, Hokkaido Ohno Memorial Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Masayuki NakanoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shin-Yurigaoka General Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan.
Takahiro OuchiDepartment of Neurology, Shin-Yurigaoka General Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan.
Masahito TakasakiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shin-Yurigaoka General Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan.
Ken IijimaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Saitama Sekishinkai Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Takaomi TairaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Keiichi AbeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirokazu IwamuroDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTranscranial magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (TcMRgFUS) has the advantage of allowing immediate evaluation of therapeutic effects after each sonication and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to visualize the lesion. When the image shows that the lesion has missed the planned target and the therapeutic effects are insufficient, the target of the subsequent ablation can be finely adjusted based on the image. The precision of this adjustment is determined by the image quality. However, the current intraoperative image quality with a 3.0T MRI system is insufficient for precisely detecting the lesion. Thus, we developed and validated a method for improving intraoperative image quality.

methodsBecause intraoperative image quality is affected by transmitter gain (TG), we acquired T2-weighted images (T2WIs) with two types of TG: the automatically adjusted TG (auto TG) and the manually adjusted TG (manual TG). To evaluate the character of images with 2 TGs, the actual flip angle (FA), the image uniformity, and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were measured using a phantom. Then, to assess the quality of intraoperative images, T2WIs with both TGs were acquired during TcMRgFUS for 5 patients. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the lesion was retrospectively estimated.

resultsThe images of the phantom with the auto TG showed substantial variations between the preset and actual FAs (p < 0.01), whereas on the images with the manual TG, there were no variations between the two FAs (p > 0.05). The total image uniformity was considerably lower with the manual TG than with the auto TG (p < 0.01), indicating that the image's signal values with the manual TG were more uniform. The manual TG produced significantly higher SNRs than the auto TG (p < 0.01). In the clinical study, the lesions were clearly detected in intraoperative images with the manual TG, but they were difficult to identify in images with the auto TG. The CNR of lesions in images with manual TG was considerably higher than in images with auto TG (p < 0.01).

conclusionRegarding intraoperative T2WIs using a 3.0T MRI system during TcMRgFUS, the manual TG method improved image quality and delineated the ablative lesion more clearly than the current method with auto TG.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingUltrasonic Surgical ProceduresHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyPhantoms, ImagingRetrospective StudiesEssential tremorFlip angle, magnetic resonance imagingStereotactic thalamotomyTranscranial magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgeryTransmitter gain

Identifiers

PMID37379811
PMCPMC10614472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.