ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2023
An improved method for intracellular DNA (iDNA) recovery from terrestrial environments.
Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Depth-dependent differences between direct total DNA and an intracellular-DNA-enriched fraction in bulk-soil bacterial and fungal communities of a Lonicera japonica field.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Small-Scale Mineral and Microbial Heterogeneities near a Fumarole at the Furnas Hydrothermal Zone on the Azores.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integrated microfluidic device for DNA extraction using electric valves.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Metabolic transitions along a moisture gradient in a poly-extreme high-altitude desert ecosystem within the Atacama Desert.Environmental microbiome · 2026Article
- Synthesized double stranded gene fragments are not suitable for qPCR endogenous control spike-ins.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- Hydrology masks warming effects on microbial communities in salt marsh soils.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2025Article
- From single pioneers to complex pro- and eukaryotic microbial networks in soils along a glacier forefield chronosequence in continental Antarctica.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- A Method for the Separation of Phytophthora Oosporesfrom Soil for DNA-Based Detection.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Microbial ecology of subsurface granitic bedrock: a humid-arid site comparison in Chile.ISME communications · 2025Article
- Inside the Atacama Desert: uncovering the living microbiome of an extreme environment.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024Article
- Revealing the Viable Microbial Community of Biofilm in a Sewage Treatment System Using Propidium Monoazide Combined with Real-Time PCR and Metagenomics.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Persistent microbial communities in hyperarid subsurface habitats of the Atacama Desert: Insights from intracellular DNA analysis.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- Improving the efficiency of DNA extraction from iron incrustations and oilfield-produced water.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- An improved method for intracellular DNA (iDNA) recovery from terrestrial environments.MicrobiologyOpen · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The simultaneous extraction of intracellular DNA (iDNA) and extracellular DNA (eDNA) can help to separate the living in situ community (represented by iDNA) from background DNA that originated both from past communities and from allochthonous sources. As iDNA and eDNA extraction protocols require separating cells from the sample matrix, their DNA yields are generally lower than direct methods that lyse the cells within the sample matrix. We, therefore, tested different buffers with and without adding a detergent mix (DM) in the extraction protocol to improve the recovery of iDNA from surface and subsurface samples that covered a variety of terrestrial environments. The combination of a highly concentrated sodium phosphate buffer plus DM significantly improved iDNA recovery for almost all tested samples. Additionally, the combination of sodium phosphate and EDTA improved iDNA recovery in most of the samples and even allowed the successful extraction of iDNA from extremely low-biomass iron-bearing rock samples taken from the deep biosphere. Based on our results, we recommend using a protocol with sodium phosphate in combination with either a DM (NaP 300 mM + DM) or EDTA (NaP + EDTA 300 mM). Furthermore, for studies that rely on the eDNA pool, we recommend using buffers solely based on sodium phosphate because the addition of EDTA or a DM resulted in a decrease in eDNA for most of the tested samples. These improvements can help reduce community bias in environmental studies and contribute to better characterizations of both modern and past ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.