Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37379332›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2023

A single-cell atlas of the sexually dimorphic Drosophila foreleg and its sensory organs during development.

Ben R Hopkins, Olga Barmina, Artyom Kopp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Emerging tools to advance neuroethology in butterflies and moths.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Morphological innovation without gene co-option: thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas of the adultbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ben R HopkinsDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9760-6185
Olga BarminaDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.
Artyom KoppDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.

Funding

Molecular Genetics of Evolutionary InnovationsR35GM122592 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ARTYOM KOPP · 2017 to 2026
$4.5M
Zeiss LSM 880 with Fast Mode Airyscan for the MCB LM Imaging FacilityS10OD026702 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PADDY, MICHAEL R · 2019 to 2019
$600k
Acquisition of Covaris E220 and Sciclone G3 systems for high throughput sequencinS10OD010786 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI COMAI, LUCA · 2012 to 2012
$311k
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122592NIH HHS S10 OD010786NIH HHS S10 OD026702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To respond to the world around them, animals rely on the input of a network of sensory organs distributed throughout the body. Distinct classes of sensory organs are specialized for the detection of specific stimuli such as strain, pressure, or taste. The features that underlie this specialization relate both to the neurons that innervate sensory organs and the accessory cells they comprise. To understand the genetic basis of this diversity of cell types, both within and between sensory organs, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing on the first tarsal segment of the male Drosophila melanogaster foreleg during pupal development. This tissue displays a wide variety of functionally and structurally distinct sensory organs, including campaniform sensilla, mechanosensory bristles, and chemosensory taste bristles, as well as the sex comb, a recently evolved male-specific structure. In this study, we characterize the cellular landscape in which the sensory organs reside, identify a novel cell type that contributes to the construction of the neural lamella, and resolve the transcriptomic differences among support cells within and between sensory organs. We identify the genes that distinguish between mechanosensory and chemosensory neurons, resolve a combinatorial transcription factor code that defines 4 distinct classes of gustatory neurons and several types of mechanosensory neurons, and match the expression of sensory receptor genes to specific neuron classes. Collectively, our work identifies core genetic features of a variety of sensory organs and provides a rich, annotated resource for studying their development and function.

Indexed as

DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterMaleSensory Receptor CellsTranscription FactorsDrosophila ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID37379332
PMCPMC10335707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.