ArticlePloS one2023
'Experiences of patients and their informal caregivers with cognitive stimulation programs for dementia: A qualitative systematic review protocol'.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCognitive stimulation, an individual or group intervention approach aiming to improve cognitive and social functioning among individuals with mild-to-moderate dementia, is often considered a complex intervention. The patient's experience of a complex intervention is unique and often determines its effectiveness. This proposed qualitative systematic review aims to comprehensively synthesise the experiences of individuals with dementia and their informal caregivers who have participated in cognitive stimulation programs, identifying perceived benefits, challenges, barriers, and facilitators to this approach to intervention.
methodsThis review will consider qualitative studies that evaluate the experiences of individuals with a diagnosis of dementia and/or the informal caregivers of individuals with dementia who have participated in a cognitive stimulation program. Searches will be conducted across MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), PsycINFO, Scopus, CINAHL (EBSCO) and Web of Science. Quality of eligible studies will be assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research, and a standardised data extraction tool in JBI SUMARI will be used to extract data from relevant studies. The meta-aggregation approach will be used to pool qualitative research findings, which will then be synthesised to produce a single set of findings in narrative format. DISCUSSION: This qualitative systematic review will identify and synthesise the evidence regarding the experiences of individuals with dementia who have taken part in a cognitive stimulation program and the experience of their informal caregivers. As a variety of cognitive stimulation programs exist, our findings will summarise the experiences of these interventions to inform the future development and delivery of cognitive stimulation programs.
trial registrationPROSPERO registration number: CRD42022383658.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.