Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37379265›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2023

Outcomes and clinical implications of intranasal insulin on cognition in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sally Wu, Nicolette Stogios, Margaret Hahn, Janani Navagnanavel, Zahra Emami, Araba Chintoh, Philip Gerretsen, Ariel Graff-Guerrero, Tarek K Rajji, Gary Remington and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06391853 (Investigating Brain Insulin Resistance in Alzheimer Disease with Intra-Nasal Insulin Administration), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06391853 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Investigating Brain Insulin Resistance in Alzheimer Disease with Intra-Nasal Insulin Administration: a Multimodal Neuroimaging Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorErasme University HospitalRan2024 to 2026Enrolled0ConditionsAlzheimer Disease, Mild Cognitive ImpairmentArmsInsulin, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sally WuSchizophrenia Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Canada.
Nicolette StogiosSchizophrenia Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Canada.
Margaret HahnSchizophrenia Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Canada.
Janani NavagnanavelHuman Biology Department, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Zahra EmamiTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Araba ChintohSchizophrenia Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Canada.
Philip GerretsenInstitute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Ariel Graff-GuerreroInstitute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Tarek K RajjiInstitute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8324-2560
Gary RemingtonSchizophrenia Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Canada.
Sri Mahavir AgarwalSchizophrenia Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2705-5146
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAberrant brain insulin signaling has been posited to lie at the crossroads of several metabolic and cognitive disorders. Intranasal insulin (INI) is a non-invasive approach that allows investigation and modulation of insulin signaling in the brain while limiting peripheral side effects.

objectivesThe objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the effects of INI on cognition in diverse patient populations and healthy individuals.

methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane CENTRAL were systematically searched from 2000 to July 2021. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials that studied the effects of INI on cognition. Two independent reviewers determined study eligibility and extracted relevant descriptive and outcome data.

resultsTwenty-nine studies (pooled N = 1,726) in healthy individuals as well as those with Alzheimer's disease (AD)/mild cognitive impairment (MCI), mental health disorders, metabolic disorders, among others, were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. Patients with AD/MCI treated with INI were more likely to show an improvement in global cognition (SMD = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.05-0.38 p = <0.00001, N = 12 studies). Among studies with healthy individuals and other patient populations, no significant effects of INI were found for global cognition.

conclusionsThis review demonstrates that INI may be associated with pro-cognitive benefits for global cognition, specifically for individuals with AD/MCI. Further studies are required to better understand the neurobiological mechanisms and differences in etiology to dissect the intrinsic and extrinsic factors contributing to the treatment response of INI.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognition DisordersCognitive DysfunctionCognitionHumansInsulinInsulin

Identifiers

PMID37379265
PMCPMC10306194
OpenAlexW4382467867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.