Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37379127›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

Inference of microbial covariation networks using copula models with mixture margins.

Rebecca A Deek, Hongzhe Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Generating correlated data for omics simulation.PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rebecca A DeekDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
Hongzhe LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3662-3907

Funding

Statistical Methods for Microbiome and MetagenomicsR01GM123056 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LEE, HONGZHE · 2017 to 2025
$3.7M
Methods for Integrative Genomic Data AnalysisR01GM129781 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Hongzhe Lee · 2018 to 2026
$3.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123056NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM129781NIH HHS GM123056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationQuantification of microbial covariations from 16S rRNA and metagenomic sequencing data is difficult due to their sparse nature. In this article, we propose using copula models with mixed zero-beta margins for the estimation of taxon-taxon covariations using data of normalized microbial relative abundances. Copulas allow for separate modeling of the dependence structure from the margins, marginal covariate adjustment, and uncertainty measurement.

resultsOur method shows that a two-stage maximum-likelihood approach provides accurate estimation of model parameters. A corresponding two-stage likelihood ratio test for the dependence parameter is derived and is used for constructing covariation networks. Simulation studies show that the test is valid, robust, and more powerful than tests based upon Pearson's and rank correlations. Furthermore, we demonstrate that our method can be used to build biologically meaningful microbial networks based on a dataset from the American Gut Project. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: R package for implementation is available at https://github.com/rebeccadeek/CoMiCoN.

Indexed as

MetagenomeMicrobial ConsortiaComputer SimulationLikelihood FunctionsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID37379127
PMCPMC10336025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.