Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37378946›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2023

Brain Tumor Classification based on Improved Stacked Ensemble Deep Learning Methods.

Zobeda Hatif Naji Al-Azzwi, A N Nazarov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zobeda Hatif Naji Al-AzzwiSchool of Radio Engineering and Computer Technology, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow, Russian Federation.
A N NazarovFederal Research Center "Computer Science and Control" of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBrain Tumor diagnostic prediction is essential for assisting radiologists and other healthcare professionals in identifying and classifying brain tumors. For the diagnosis and treatment of cancer diseases, prediction and classification accuracy are crucial. The aim of this study was to improve ensemble deep learning models for classifing brain tumor and increase the performance of structure models by combining different model of deep learning to develop a model with more accurate predictions than the individual models.

methodsConvolutional neural networks (CNNs), which are made up of a single algorithm called CNN model, are the foundation of most current methods for classifying cancer illness images. The model CNN is combined with other models to create other methods of classification called ensemble method. However, compared to a single machine learning algorithm, ensemble machine learning models are more accurate. This study used stacked ensemble deep learning technology. The data set used in this study was obtained from Kaggle and included two categories: abnormal & normal brains. The data set was trained with three models: VGG19, Inception v3, and Resnet 10.

resultThe 96.6% accuracy for binary classification (0,1) have been achieved by stacked ensemble deep learning model with Loss binary cross entropy, and Adam optimizer take into consideration with stacking models.

conclusionThe stacked ensemble deep learning model can be improved over a single framework.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningAlgorithmsBrainHealth PersonnelHumansClassificationEnsemble learning StackingMRI imagepre-trained models

Identifiers

PMID37378946
PMCPMC10505861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.