ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2023
Diagnostic Accuracy of Lymph Nodes Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy Based on The Sydney System for Reporting Lymph Node Cytology.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Sydney system for lymph node FNA biopsy cytopathology: A detailed analysis of recent publications and meta-analysis and a proposal for the components of an ideal prospective study of a cytopathology reporting system.Cancer cytopathology · 2024Pooled it
- The Atypical and Suspicious for Malignancy Categories of the WHO Reporting System for Lymph Node, Spleen, and Thymus Cytopathology: Review of their Diagnostic Utility, Limitations, and Clinical Impact.Diagnostic cytopathology · 2026Review
- Sydney Reporting System for Lymph Node Fine-Needle Aspiration and Malignancy Risk Stratification: Is It of Clinical Value?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy as a Diagnostic Modality for Orbital Adnexal Lymphoma.Acta cytologica · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Fine-Needle Aspiration of Lymph Nodes and Assessment of Risk of Malignancy Based on the Sydney System of Reporting Lymph Node Cytology.Journal of cytologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and malignancy risk of The Sydney System Reporting for Lymph Nodes Cytology. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis study utilized secondary data from 156 cases to conduct a retrospective analysis of a diagnostic test method. During 2019-2021, data were collected at Dr. Wahidin Sudirohusodo's Anatomical Pathology Laboratory in Makassar, Indonesia. The cytology slides of each case were split into five diagnostic groups using the Sydney method, which were then compared with the results of the histopathological diagnosis.
resultsThere were six cases in the L1 category, thirty-two cases in the L2 category, thirteen patients in the L3 category, seventeen cases in the L4 category, and ninety-one cases in the L5 class. The malignant probability (MP) is computed for each diagnostic classification. L1 MP value is 66.7%, L2 MP value is 15.6%, L3 MP value is 76.9%, L4 MP value is 94.0%, and L5 MP value is 98.9%. The diagnostic value of the FNAB examination is as follows: 89.9% sensitivity, 92.9% specificity, 98.2% positive predictive value, 68.4% negative predictive value, and 90.47% diagnostic accuracy.
conclusionThe FNAB examination provides high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in diagnosing lymph node tumors. Using a classification based on the Sydney system promotes communication between laboratories and clinicians.<br />.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.