Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37378843›Full record

ReviewClinical neuroradiology2023

Early Outcomes of the Pipeline Vantage Flow Diverter : A Multicentre Study.

Sara Sciacca, Ahmed Bassiouny, Nina Mansoor, Thais Minett, Parthiban Balasundaram, Juveria Siddiqui, Yogish Joshi, Shahram Derakhshani, Naga Kandasamy, Thomas Calvert Booth and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical neuroradiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sara SciaccaDepartment of Neuroradiology, King's College Hospital, London, UK. sara.sciacca@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5263-0392
Ahmed BassiounyDepartment of Neuroradiology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Nina MansoorDepartment of Neuroradiology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Thais MinettDepartment of Neuroradiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Parthiban BalasundaramDepartment of Neuroradiology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Juveria SiddiquiDepartment of Neuroradiology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Yogish JoshiDepartment of Neuroradiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Shahram DerakhshaniBarking Havering and Redbridge Hospitals NHS Trust, Romford, UK.
Naga KandasamyDepartment of Neuroradiology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Thomas Calvert BoothDepartment of Neuroradiology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Jeremy LynchDepartment of Neuroradiology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe recently introduced Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device with Shield Technology is the fourth generation of Pipeline flow diverter devices. Due to the relatively high rate of intraprocedural technical complications, modifications were subsequently made to the device after a limited release of the device in 2020. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the modified version of this device.

methodsThis was a multicentre retrospective series. The primary efficacy endpoint was aneurysm occlusion in the absence of retreatment. The primary safety endpoint was any neurological morbidity or death. Ruptured and unruptured aneurysms were included in the study.

resultsA total of 52 procedures were performed for 60 target aneurysms. Treatment was performed on 5 patients with ruptured aneurysms. The technical success rate was 98%. The mean clinical follow-up time was 5.5 months. In patients presenting with unruptured aneurysms there were no deaths, 3 (6.4%) major complications and 7 (13%) minor complications. In the five patients presenting with subarachnoid haemorrhage there were 2 (40%) major complications with 1 (20%) of these resulting in death, and 1 (20%) minor complication. Of the patients 29 (56%) had undergone 6‑monthly postprocedural angiographic imaging with a mean time of 6.6 months demonstrating that 83% of patients had achieved adequate occlusion (RROC1/2) of the aneurysm.

conclusionsIn this non-industry-sponsored study, the occlusion rates and safety outcomes were similar to those seen in previously published studies with flow diverter devices and earlier generation Pipeline devices. Modifications to the device appear to have improved ease of deployment.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresIntracranial AneurysmCerebral AngiographyFollow-Up StudiesHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRetrospective StudiesStentsTreatment OutcomeCerebral aneurysmCoilingDigital subtraction angiographyEmbolization deviceEndovascular treatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.