Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37378796›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2023

Implementation of a structured robotic colorectal curriculum for general surgery residents.

Kenley Unruh, Stephanie Stovall, Lily Chang, Shanley Deal, Jennifer A Kaplan, Ravi Moonka, Vlad V Simianu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. European Society of Coloproctology guideline on training in robotic colorectal surgery (2024).Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024
    Guideline
  5. Immersive robotic colorectal training in the United Kingdom is safe and efficient.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kenley UnruhDepartment of Surgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 9Th Ave, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA. kenleyu@gmail.com.
Stephanie StovallDepartment of Surgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 9Th Ave, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Lily ChangDepartment of Surgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 9Th Ave, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Shanley DealDepartment of Surgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 9Th Ave, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Jennifer A KaplanDepartment of Surgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 9Th Ave, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Ravi MoonkaDepartment of Surgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 9Th Ave, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Vlad V SimianuDepartment of Surgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 9Th Ave, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing demand for colorectal robotic training for general surgery residents. We implemented a robotic colorectal surgery curriculum expecting that it would increase resident exposure to the robotic platform and would increase the number of graduating general surgery residents obtaining a robotic equivalency certificate. The aim of this study is to describe the components of the curriculum and characterize the immediate impact of the implementation or residents. Our curriculum started in 2019 and consists of didactics, simulation, and clinical performance. Objectives are specified for both junior residents (post-graduate years [PGY]1-2) and senior residents (PGY3-5). The robotic colorectal surgical experience was characterized by comparing robotic to non-robotic operations, differences in robotic operations across post-graduate year, and percentage of graduates achieving an equivalency certificate. Robotic operations are tracked using case log annotation. From 2017 to 2021, 25 residents logged 681 major operations on the colorectal service (PGY1 mean = 7.6 ± 4.6, PGY4 mean = 29.7 ± 14.4, PGY5 mean = 29.8 ± 14.8). Robotic colorectal operations made up 24% of PGY1 (49% laparoscopic, 27% open), 35% of PGY4 (35% laparoscopic, 29% open), and 41% of PGY5 (44% laparoscopic, 15% open) major colorectal operations. Robotic bedside experience is primarily during PGY1 (PGY1 mean 2.0 ± 2.0 bedside operations vs 1.4 ± 1.6 and 0.2 ± 0.4 for PGY4 and 5, respectively). Most PGY4 and 5 robotic experience is on the console (PGY4 mean 9.1 ± 7.7 console operations, PGY5 mean 12.0 ± 4.8 console operations). Rates of robotic certification for graduating chief residents increased from 0% for E-2013 to 100% for E-2018. Our robotic colorectal curriculum for general surgery residents has facilitated earlier and increased robotic exposure for residents and increased robotic certification for our graduates.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsGeneral SurgeryInternship and ResidencyRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresClinical CompetenceCurriculumEducation, Medical, GraduateHumansColorectalCurriculumResidencyRobotics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.