ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2023
Making Radiation Oncology specialty more attractive to young medical graduates: pulling back the invisibility curtain.
Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the quality of radiation oncology education in four German medical schools: a student perspective and comparison with DEGRO recommendations.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRadiation Oncology is one of the least-known medical specialties for young graduates at the end of their studies. An in-depth analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the Radiation Oncology visibility, the training plan, and why it is less attractive for new medical residents during the last years appears as the initial need to turn out this lack of knowledge. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn anonymous pilot survey of 24 questions addressed to specialists in-training in Radiation Oncology in Spain during August and September of 2022.
resultsA total of 50 in-training radiation oncologists answered the questionnaire and 90% of them believe that a lack of knowledge, mainly at the School of Medicine, was a major reason why choosing Radiation Oncology was unattractive. All responders were satisfied by choosing Radiation Oncology, and 76% were in favor of extending the residency to 5 years to improve their training. Research activity was considered essential (78%) to complete their training.
conclusionIncreasing the presence of Radiation Oncology at the School of Medicine may be one solution to achieve greater attractiveness among future residents. Likewise, extending the training period to five years could help to enhance the learning of all radiotherapy techniques while promoting clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.