ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2024
Movement during the acquisition of a visual landmark may be necessary for rapid learning in ants.
Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Innate visual attraction before, during and after escape from adverse substrates in carpenter ants.The Journal of experimental biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We conducted laboratory experiments using Japanese carpenter ants (Camponotus japonicus) to investigate whether movement during visual learning can influence the learning performance of ant foragers. We performed three different experiments. In the first experiment, the ants could move freely in a straight maze during the visual learning. The ants in the experiments two and three were fixed to a certain position during the visual learning training. A distinct difference between these two experiments was that the ants in one experiment could perceive an approaching visual stimulus during the training, although they were fixed. After training phases, a Y-maze test was performed. One arm of the Y-maze had a visual stimulus presented to the ants during the training. We found that the ants in the first experiment showed rapid learning and correctly selected the landmark arm. However, the ants in the experiments two and three did not exhibit any preference for the chosen arm. Interestingly, we found differences in the time spent around a certain location in the Y-maze between the experiments two and three. These results suggest that movement during visual learning may influence the rapid learning of ant foragers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.