Trial reportAnnals of nuclear medicine2023
Assessment of anti-GAD65-associated cerebellar ataxia with
Trial report in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAnti-glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (anti-GAD65)-associated neurological disorders include two major phenotypes, namely Stiff person syndrome (SPS) and cerebellar ataxia (CA). Considering the potential for better outcomes with prompt immunotherapy, early detection of CA is crucial. Hence, a non-invasive imaging biomarker to detect CA with high specificity is desired. Herein, we evaluated brain 2-deoxy-2-[
methodsThis study was based on STARD 2015 guidelines: thirty patients with anti-GAD65-associated neurological disorders, 11 of whom with CA were studied. Five test sets were created after patients were randomly sorted and divided into 5 equal folds. Each iteration included 24 patients for ROC analysis and 6 patients reserved for testing. The Z scores of left cerebellum, vermis, right cerebellum, and the average of the three regions were used in ROC analysis to determine areas with significant area under the curve (AUC). The cut-off values with high specificity were determined among the 24 patients in each iteration and tested against the reserved 6 patients.
resultsLeft cerebellum and average of the three regions showed significant AUC above 0.5 in all iterations with left cerebellum being the highest AUC in 4 iterations. Testing the cut-off values of the left cerebellum against the reserved 6 patients in each iteration showed 100% specificity with sensitivities ranging from 0 to 75%.
conclusionsCerebellar
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.