ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2024
A Scoping Review on the Use of Machine Learning in Return-to-Work Studies: Strengths and Weaknesses.
Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable Prediction of Prolonged Work Disability After Occupational Injury and Disease: Temporal Validation and Sex-Specific Performance.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Large Language Models for Clinical Data Extraction in Workplace Injury Rehabilitation: Protocol for a Retrospective Pilot Study of Accuracy, Fairness, and Methodological Considerations in Workers' Compensation Medical Chart Review.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Antecedents of Long‑Term Work Disability After Mental Health-Related Sickness Absence: The Role of Occupational Health Care Pathways.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Article
- A Socioeconomic Vulnerability Index for Persons with Disabilities via Machine Learning Approach.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Occupational Health: Global Umbrella Review of Applications and Limitations.Safety and health at work · 2026Review
- Attitudes, Needs, and Expectations Regarding the Application of AI in Occupational Healthcare: A Multiple Stakeholder Perspective.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2026Article
- The SEWAbility system: a video-based job analysis framework for understanding task-specific job demands.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Machine Learning to Predict Return to Work After Medical Rehabilitation for Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Exploring factors shaping employment outcomes of people with disabilities through the PEOP model: a scoping review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Review
- Stakeholder perspectives on job analysis for disability-inclusive sewing employment in China: a qualitative content analysis.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
- Vocational rehabilitation and return to work after spinal cord injury: a scoping review of policies in the U.S. and Canada.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Review
- Approaches for the Use of AI in Workplace Health Promotion and Prevention: Systematic Scoping Review.JMIR AI · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDecisions to increase work participation must be informed and timely to improve return to work (RTW). The implementation of research into clinical practice relies on sophisticated yet practical approaches such as machine learning (ML). The objective of this study is to explore the evidence of machine learning in vocational rehabilitation and discuss the strengths and areas for improvement in the field.
methodsWe used the PRISMA guidelines and the Arksey and O'Malley framework. We searched Ovid Medline, CINAHL, and PsycINFO; with hand-searching and use of the Web of Science for the final articles. We included studies that are peer-reviewed, published within the last 10 years to consider contemporary material, implemented a form of "machine learning" or "learning health system", undertaken in a vocational rehabilitation setting, and has employment as a specific outcome.
results12 studies were analyzed. The most commonly studied population was musculoskeletal injuries or health conditions. Most of the studies came from Europe and most were retrospective studies. The interventions were not always reported or specified. ML was used to identify different work-related variables that were predictive of return to work. However, ML approaches were varied and no standard or predominant ML approach was evident.
conclusionsML offers a potentially beneficial approach to identifying predictors of RTW. While ML uses a complex calculation and estimation, ML complements other elements of evidence-based practice such as the clinician's expertise, the worker's preference and values, and contextual factors around RTW in an efficient and timely manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37378718What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.