Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37378632›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2023

Clinical Activity of Combined Telomerase Vaccination and Pembrolizumab in Advanced Melanoma: Results from a Phase I Trial.

Espen B Ellingsen, Steven O'Day, Artur Mezheyeuski, Agnieszka Gromadka, Trevor Clancy, Timothy S Kristedja, Mohammed Milhem, Yousef Zakharia

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Espen B EllingsenDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0235-1184
Steven O'DayProvidence Saint John's Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, California.ORCID 0009-0005-5345-5417
Artur MezheyeuskiHistoOne AB, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4394-2634
Agnieszka GromadkaNEC OncoImmunity, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3304-6772
Trevor ClancyNEC OncoImmunity, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9896-0613
Timothy S KristedjaProvidence Saint John's Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, California.ORCID 0009-0000-5134-3669
Mohammed MilhemUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.ORCID 0000-0003-4663-6824
Yousef ZakhariaUniversity of Iowa and Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, Iowa.ORCID 0000-0001-9480-2626
OncoImmune (United States) · USAgenus (United States) · USOslo University Hospital · NOSaint John's Health Center · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · US

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Christopher K Laubenthal · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA086862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCancer vaccines represent a novel treatment modality with a complementary mode of action addressing a crucial bottleneck for checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) efficacy. CPIs are expected to release brakes in T-cell responses elicited by vaccination, leading to more robust immune responses. Increased antitumor T-cell responses may confer increased antitumor activity in patients with less immunogenic tumors, a subgroup expected to achieve reduced benefit from CPIs alone. In this trial, a telomerase-based vaccine was combined with pembrolizumab to assess the safety and clinical activity in patients with melanoma. PATIENTS AND

methodsThirty treatment-naïve patients with advanced melanoma were enrolled. Patients received intradermal injections of UV1 with adjuvant GM-CSF at two dose levels, and pembrolizumab according to the label. Blood samples were assessed for vaccine-induced T-cell responses, and tumor tissues were collected for translational analyses. The primary endpoint was safety, with secondary objectives including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR).

resultsThe combination was considered safe and well-tolerated. Grade 3 adverse events were observed in 20% of patients, with no grade 4 or 5 adverse events reported. Vaccination-related adverse events were mostly mild injection site reactions. The median PFS was 18.9 months, and the 1- and 2-year OS rates were 86.7% and 73.3%, respectively. The ORR was 56.7%, with 33.3% achieving complete responses. Vaccine-induced immune responses were observed in evaluable patients, and inflammatory changes were detected in posttreatment biopsies.

conclusionsEncouraging safety and preliminary efficacy were observed. Randomized phase II trials are currently ongoing.

Indexed as

MelanomaTelomeraseAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHumansVaccinationAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedpembrolizumabTelomerase

Identifiers

PMID37378632
PMCPMC10425723
OpenAlexW4382344271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.