Comparison of Arthroscopic-Assisted Percutaneous Internal Fixation With a Modified Reducer Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Schatzker Type II and III Tibial Plateau Fractures.

Background: Tibial plateau fractures require anatomical reduction and stable fixation to achieve satisfactory results. In addition, addressing any related injuries is of paramount importance. Arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) has been promoted as a possible technique to treat tibial plateau fractures. Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of ARIF with this modified reducer and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for Schatzker types II and III tibial plateau fractures. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 68 patients who were treated for Schatzker type II or III tibial plateau fractures between August 1, 2014, and October 31, 2018. Patients were categorized into the ARIF (n = 33) and ORIF groups (n = 35). The groups were compared regarding intra-articular injuries, duration of hospital stay, complications, and clinical outcomes-including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, and range of motion (ROM). The paired Results: The median follow-up period was 36 months (26-40 months). Additional intra-articular lesions were found in 29 patients-21 in the ARIF group and 8 in the ORIF group ( Conclusion: ARIF with a modified reducer was found to be an effective, reliable, and safe procedure for the treatment of Schatzker types II and III tibial plateau fractures. Both ARIF and ORIF provided equally good results, while ARIF offered a more precise evaluation and reduced the duration of hospital stay.