Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37378275›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2023

Long-Term Usage and Improved Clinical Outcomes with Adoption of a COPD Digital Support Service: Key Findings from the RECEIVER Trial.

Anna Taylor, Andrew Cushing, Morgan Dow, Jacqueline Anderson, Grace McDowell, Stephanie Lua, Maureen Manthe, Sandosh Padmanabhan, Shane Burns, Paul McGinness and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Personalizing Self-Management Interventions in COPD - Looking Beyond One-Size-Fits-All.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anna TaylorDepartments of Respiratory and Emergency Medicine, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, Scotland.
Andrew CushingLenus Health Ltd, Edinburgh, Scotland.ORCID 0000-0002-6215-8079
Morgan DowLenus Health Ltd, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Jacqueline AndersonDepartments of Respiratory and Emergency Medicine, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, Scotland.
Grace McDowellDepartments of Respiratory and Emergency Medicine, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, Scotland.
Stephanie LuaDepartments of Respiratory and Emergency Medicine, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, Scotland.
Maureen MantheDepartments of Respiratory and Emergency Medicine, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, Scotland.
Sandosh PadmanabhanInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.ORCID 0000-0003-3869-5808
Shane BurnsLenus Health Ltd, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Paul McGinnessLenus Health Ltd, Edinburgh, Scotland.
David J LoweDepartments of Respiratory and Emergency Medicine, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, Scotland.
Christopher CarlinDepartments of Respiratory and Emergency Medicine, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, Scotland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Digital tools may improve chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management, but further evidence of significant, persisting benefits are required. The RECEIVER trial was devised to evaluate the Lenus COPD support service by determining if people with severe COPD would continue to utilize the co-designed patient web application throughout study follow-up and to explore the impact of this digital service on clinical outcomes with its adoption alongside routine care. Patients and Methods: The prospective observational cohort hybrid implementation-effectiveness study began in September 2019 and included 83 participants. Recruitment stopped in March 2020 due to COVID-19, but follow-up continued as planned. A contemporary matched control cohort was identified to compare participant clinical outcomes with and minimize biases associated with wider COVID-19 impacts. Utilization was determined by daily COPD assessment test (CAT) completion through the application. Survival metrics and post-index date changes in annual hospitalizations were compared between the RECEIVER and control cohorts. Longitudinal quality of life and symptom burden data and community-managed exacerbation events were also captured through the application. Results: High and sustained application utilization was noted across the RECEIVER cohort with a mean follow-up of 78 weeks (64/83 participants completed at least one CAT entry on ≥50% of possible follow-up weeks). Subgroup analysis of participants resident in more socioeconomically deprived postcode areas revealed equivalent utilization. Median time to death or a COPD or respiratory-related admission was higher in the RECEIVER cohort compared to control (335 days vs 155 days). Mean reduction in annual occupied bed days was 8.12 days vs 3.38 days in the control cohort. Quality of life and symptom burden remained stable despite the progressive nature of COPD. Conclusion: The sustained utilization of the co-designed patient application and improvements in participant outcomes observed in the RECEIVER trial support scale-up implementation with continued evaluation of this digital service.

Indexed as

COVID-19Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveHospitalizationHumansQuality of LifeCOPDpatient-reported outcomesremote monitoringself-management

Identifiers

PMID37378275
PMCPMC10292615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.