Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37378221›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Comparing Prognostic Scores and Inflammatory Markers in Predicting the Severity and Mortality of Acute Pancreatitis.

Vasul Jain, Preetam Nath, Sudhir K Satpathy, Bandita Panda, Shubhransu Patro

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vasul JainDepartment of General Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Preetam NathDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Sudhir K SatpathyDepartment of General Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Bandita PandaDepartment of Research and Development, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Shubhransu PatroDepartment of General Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar · INInstitute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute pancreatitis is an emergency gastrointestinal condition for which severity prediction is crucial during hospitalization. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of inflammatory markers with gold standard scoring systems in predicting pancreatitis severity. MATERIALS AND

methodsA prospective, hospital-based, cohort study was conducted, including 249 patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis via clinical examination. Laboratory investigations and radiological investigations were conducted. The diagnostic accuracy of the inflammatory markers neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR), red cell distribution width (RDW), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) was compared with gold standard prognostic scores, namely, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP), and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), in predicting primary and secondary outcomes. All values were analyzed using mean and standard deviation (SD). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for mortality prediction were calculated for NLR, LMR, RDW, and PNI.

resultsOf 249 patients with acute pancreatitis (mean age: 39-43 years), 94 were classified as mild acute, 74 as moderately severe acute, and 81 as severe acute. The most common etiology was alcohol use (40.2%), followed by gallstones (29.7%), hypertriglyceridemia (6.4%), steroid use (4%), diabetic ketoacidosis (2.8%), hypercalcemia (2.8%), and complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (2%). On day 1, mean values of NLR, LMR, RDW, and PNI were 8.23±5.11, 2.63±1.76, 15.93±3.64, and 32.84±8.13, respectively. Compared to APACHE II, SAPS II, BISAP, and SIRS on day 1, day 3, day 7, and day 14, the cutoff values for NLR were 4.06, 10.75, 8.75, and 13.75, respectively. Similarly, on day 1, the cutoff value of LMR was 1.95, and on day 1 and day 3, the cutoff values of RDW were 14.75% and 15%, respectively.

conclusionThe results indicate that inflammatory biomarkers NLR, LMR, RDW, and PNI are comparable with gold standard scoring systems for predicting the severity and mortality of acute pancreatitis. NLR on day 7 was significantly associated with higher severity of illness. NLR on days 3, 7, and 14, LMR on day 1, and RDW on days 1 and 3 were significantly associated with mortality.

Indexed as

acute pancreatitislymphocyte/monocyte rationeutrophil/lymphocyte ratioprognostic nutritional indexred cell distribution

Identifiers

PMID37378221
PMCPMC10292087
OpenAlexW4378469396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.