ArticleCureus2023
Correlation of Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy With Histopathological Results.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In suspicious for malignancy thyroid nodule aspirates, nuclei characteristics deserves special attention in reported cytology analysis - real world scenario cohort.Archives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is an effective method used in the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules. The Bethesda system has contributed to the determination of clinical approaches by bringing standardization to cytopathology reporting. However, the rate of cytological-histological incompatibility varies between 10% and 30%. Results differ according to clinics in the literature. These results create a need to reevaluate the efficacy and safety of fine needle aspiration biopsy. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FNAB of thyroid nodules by correlating the cytopathology results of FNAB with the results of postoperative histopathology. Methods In this retrospective study, thyroid FNAB results and postoperative histopathology results of patients who underwent thyroidectomy operations in our clinic between January 2018 and December 2021 were compared. Accuracy, sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), false positive rate (FPR), and false negative rate (FNR) were calculated. Cases with nondiagnostic FNAB results were excluded from the calculations. FNAB results with a follicular neoplasm/suspicious for a follicular neoplasm (FN/SFN) and suspicious for malignancy were included in the malignant group. Results A total of 304 patients were included in the study. The male/female ratio was 1:3.3. As a result of the study, malignancy was detected histopathologically in 47 (15.46%) patients. The commonest malignancy detected was papillary carcinoma. According to the Bethesda system, the results were evaluated in six categories. The incidence of malignancy in the Bethesda categories were 0%, 4%, 40%, 69.2%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Accordingly, the specificity and sensitivity of FNAB for detecting malignancy were 98.7% and 66.6%, respectively. The accuracy was 93.5%. The false positive rate, false negative rate, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 1.20%, 33.3%, 91.4%, and 93.8%, respectively. Conclusion Thyroid FNAB is an effective method used with satisfactory reliability in the differential diagnosis of malignancies of thyroid nodules. Still, it has some limitations. This article demonstrates higher rates of malignancy in Bethesda categories III and IV. Therefore, clinical approaches are gaining importance in these categories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.