ArticleCureus2023
Implementing Smartphone Tutorials for Patients With Severe Glaucoma.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of the study is to determine if instructional videos detailing the use of smartphone accessibility features may be used to improve quality of life and comfort with phone usage among patients with severe glaucoma. Design The design of the present study is an interventional case series. Methods The patients with vision loss due to severe glaucoma were recruited from one institution. Two surveys were completed to provide baseline data: one detailed their current use of smartphone accessibility features, and the other provided survey was the EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) (EuroQol Group, Rotterdam, Netherlands), which is used to assess the quality of life. Then, the patients were shown a brief video with instructions on configuring the use of voice-over, magnification, and zoom functions, along with other features. To conclude, the patients completed the same surveys either at follow-up visits or by phone calls. Results Fifteen patients were recruited to participate in the study. At baseline, the participants used a median of one accessibility feature, with the most common feature being "text sizing/bolding." At follow-up, the participants averaged the gain of use of one accessibility feature and reported a decrease in text messaging visual limitation, although these findings did not reach statistical significance. Overall, the quality of life, as measured by the EQ-5D-5L, demonstrated a non-statistically significant increase of six points. Conclusions Despite the lack of statistical significance, our results indicate that providing instructional videos may benefit the patients' ability to navigate on their smartphones. Incorporating links or Quick Response (QR) codes to these instructional videos provides an opportunity to improve the quality of life at no additional risk to the patient. Further studies are needed with an increased population to investigate for any significance of our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.