ArticleCureus2023
Significance of Nuclear Morphometry in Breast Lesions: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is one of the reliable methods in diagnosing breast cancers. Morphometric studies are done in benign and malignant neoplasms of various organs by using software, which measures cellular, cytoplasmic, and nuclear parameters. Nuclear parameters define the behavior of the neoplasm. This study aims to evaluate nuclear morphometry parameters in aspirated smears of breast lesions and determine the association between cytological findings with nuclear morphometry parameters. Methodology It's a retrospective cytology study from July 2020 to June 2022 conducted at a tertiary health care center in Kolar, Karnataka, India. The FNAC smears of breast mass were analyzed cytologically and were subjected to nuclear morphometry study. Nuclear parameters such as nuclear area, nuclear perimeter, nuclear Feret diameter, minimum Feret, and shape factor were captured in Zen software (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; Laboratory for Optical and Computational Instrumentation [LOCI], University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA). The association between nuclear morphometric findings and cytological findings was noted. A descriptive statistical analysis was done. Results Sixty cases of mass in the breast were considered for the study of which 37 cases were benign and 23 were malignant. Nuclear morphometry parameters such as nuclear area, nuclear perimeter, nuclear Feret diameter, minimum Feret, and shape factor for benign breast lesions were 25.16 ± 3.2 µm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.