ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023
CrossDome: an interactive R package to predict cross-reactivity risk using immunopeptidomics databases.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning-based prediction of cross-immunity.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- MHCXGraph: a graph-based approach to detecting T-cell receptor cross-reactivity.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Computational prediction of TCR cross-reactivity: principles, challenges and translational opportunities.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Mapping the TCR landscape: computational tools empowering translational immunology and therapy design.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Review
- The GF-NEO discovery platform unveils a [KQE][DG] sequence motif within fusion neoantigens in pediatric cancer.iScience · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and the Evolving Landscape of Immunopeptidomics.Proteomics. Clinical applications · 2025Review
- SCAN-ACT: adoptive T cell therapy target discovery through single-cell transcriptomics.Genome medicine · 2025Article
- Identification of immunogenic KIF5B-RET fusion neopeptides driving immune stimulation in tumor specific CD8+ T cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Strengths and limitations of web servers for the modeling of TCRpMHC complexes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- MORITS: An improved method to predict peptides from heterologous proteins that are recognized by the same T-cell receptor.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Novel insights into TCR-T cell therapy in solid neoplasms: optimizing adoptive immunotherapy.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2024Review
- Quantitative approaches for decoding the specificity of the human T cell repertoire.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- TCR-pMHC Binding Specificity Prediction From Structure Using Graph Neural Networks.IEEE transactions on computational biology and bioinformaticsArticle
- Vaccines against extraintestinal pathogenicGut microbesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
T-cell-based immunotherapies hold tremendous potential in the fight against cancer, thanks to their capacity to specifically targeting diseased cells. Nevertheless, this potential has been tempered with safety concerns regarding the possible recognition of unknown off-targets displayed by healthy cells. In a notorious example, engineered T-cells specific to MAGEA3 (EVDPIGHLY) also recognized a TITIN-derived peptide (ESDPIVAQY) expressed by cardiac cells, inducing lethal damage in melanoma patients. Such off-target toxicity has been related to T-cell cross-reactivity induced by molecular mimicry. In this context, there is growing interest in developing the means to avoid off-target toxicity, and to provide safer immunotherapy products. To this end, we present CrossDome, a multi-omics suite to predict the off-target toxicity risk of T-cell-based immunotherapies. Our suite provides two alternative protocols, i) a peptide-centered prediction, or ii) a TCR-centered prediction. As proof-of-principle, we evaluate our approach using 16 well-known cross-reactivity cases involving cancer-associated antigens. With CrossDome, the TITIN-derived peptide was predicted at the 99+ percentile rank among 36,000 scored candidates (p-value < 0.001). In addition, off-targets for all the 16 known cases were predicted within the top ranges of relatedness score on a Monte Carlo simulation with over 5 million putative peptide pairs, allowing us to determine a cut-off p-value for off-target toxicity risk. We also implemented a penalty system based on TCR hotspots, named contact map (CM). This TCR-centered approach improved upon the peptide-centered prediction on the MAGEA3-TITIN screening (e.g., from 27th to 6th, out of 36,000 ranked peptides). Next, we used an extended dataset of experimentally-determined cross-reactive peptides to evaluate alternative CrossDome protocols. The level of enrichment of validated cases among top 50 best-scored peptides was 63% for the peptide-centered protocol, and up to 82% for the TCR-centered protocol. Finally, we performed functional characterization of top ranking candidates, by integrating expression data, HLA binding, and immunogenicity predictions. CrossDome was designed as an R package for easy integration with antigen discovery pipelines, and an interactive web interface for users without coding experience. CrossDome is under active development, and it is available at https://github.com/AntunesLab/crossdome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.