Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37377822›Full record

Trial reportSultan Qaboos University medical journal2023

Effect of Erector Spinae Block and Pectoralis Block on Quality of Recovery and Analgesia After Modified Radical Mastectomy: A randomised controlled study.

Md Hammad Mohsin, Reetu Verma, Hemlata, Dinesh Singh, Sarita Singh, Kulranjan Singh

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sultan Qaboos University medical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Md Hammad MohsinDepartment of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India.
Reetu VermaDepartments of Anaesthesiology.
HemlataDepartments of Anaesthesiology.
Dinesh SinghDepartments of Anaesthesiology.
Sarita SinghDepartments of Anaesthesiology.
Kulranjan SinghEndocrine Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.
King George's Medical University · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Post-operative pain after a modified radical mastectomy ranges from moderate to severe. Pectoralis (PECS) block has been found to be more effective than erector spinae block in reducing pain and the consumption of rescue analgesia in the post-operative period. This study aimed to compare the effect of erector spinae block and PECS block on the quality of recovery after modified radical mastectomy using the quality of recovery (QoR-40) score. Methods: This randomised controlled study was conducted at King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India, from 9 Results: A total of 90 patients were included (30 in each group). In the post-operative period after 24 hours, global QoR-40 scores were 183.64 ± 6.36, 179.68 ± 6.38 and 171.37 ± 6.88 in the PECS, ESP and control groups ( Conclusion: Both ESP and PECS blocks were effective in improving the QoR score and in reducing the consumption of rescue analgesia after modified radical mastectomy.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaBreast NeoplasmsNerve BlockAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalFemaleHumansMastectomyMastectomy, Modified RadicalPostoperative PainAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalCancerIndiaMastectomyPostoperative PainPost-Operative Recovery

Identifiers

PMID37377822
PMCPMC10292604
OpenAlexW4296988398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.