Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37377807›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2023

Plant protection from virus: a review of different approaches.

Irina Anikina, Aidana Kamarova, Kuralay Issayeva, Saltanat Issakhanova, Nazymgul Mustafayeva, Madina Insebayeva, Akmaral Mukhamedzhanova, Shujaul Mulk Khan, Zeeshan Ahmad, Linda Heejung Lho and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Irina AnikinaBiotechnology Department, Toraighyrov University, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan.
Aidana KamarovaBiology and Ecology Department, Toraighyrov University, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan.
Kuralay IssayevaBiotechnology Department, Toraighyrov University, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan.
Saltanat IssakhanovaBiotechnology Department, Toraighyrov University, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan.
Nazymgul MustafayevaAgrotechnology Department, Toraighyrov University, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan.
Madina InsebayevaBiotechnology Department, Toraighyrov University, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan.
Akmaral MukhamedzhanovaBiotechnology Department, Toraighyrov University, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan.
Shujaul Mulk KhanDepartment of Plant Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Zeeshan AhmadDepartment of Plant Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Linda Heejung LhoCollege of Business, Division of Tourism and Hotel Management, Cheongju University, Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, Republic of Korea.
Heesup HanCollege of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
António RaposoCBIOS (Research Center for Biosciences and Health Technologies), Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias, Lisboa, Portugal.
Toraighyrov University · KZQuaid-i-Azam University · PKCheongju University · KRSejong University · KRUniversidade Lusófona · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review analyzes methods for controlling plant viral infection. The high harmfulness of viral diseases and the peculiarities of viral pathogenesis impose special requirements regarding developing methods to prevent phytoviruses. The control of viral infection is complicated by the rapid evolution, variability of viruses, and the peculiarities of their pathogenesis. Viral infection in plants is a complex interdependent process. The creation of transgenic varieties has caused much hope in the fight against viral pathogens. The disadvantages of genetically engineered approaches include the fact that the resistance gained is often highly specific and short-lived, and there are bans in many countries on the use of transgenic varieties. Modern prevention methods, diagnosis, and recovery of planting material are at the forefront of the fight against viral infection. The main techniques used for the healing of virus-infected plants include the apical meristem method, which is combined with thermotherapy and chemotherapy. These methods represent a single biotechnological complex method of plant recovery from viruses

Indexed as

elicitorsmethod of apical meristemsplant virusPR-proteinsresistance genes

Identifiers

PMID37377807
PMCPMC10291191
OpenAlexW4380264218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.