ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023
Drought and recovery in barley: key gene networks and retrotransposon response.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of developmental dynamics on WRKY expression in barley with varying phenologies and trichome micromorphologies.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Combined multi-omics and physiological approaches to elucidate drought-response mechanisms of durum wheat.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Growth responses of spring barley to varying levels of drought priming.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Evaluating waterlogging stress response and recovery in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.): an image-based phenotyping approach.Plant methods · 2024Article
- Genetic control of root/shoot biomass partitioning in barley seedlings.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Dynamic physiological response of tef to contrasting water availabilities.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Precision phenotyping of a barley diversity set reveals distinct drought response strategies.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Drought response of water-conserving and non-conserving spring barley cultivars.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: During drought, plants close their stomata at a critical soil water content (SWC), together with making diverse physiological, developmental, and biochemical responses. Methods: Using precision-phenotyping lysimeters, we imposed pre-flowering drought on four barley varieties (Arvo, Golden Promise, Hankkija 673, and Morex) and followed their physiological responses. For Golden Promise, we carried out RNA-seq on leaf transcripts before and during drought and during recovery, also examining retrotransposon Results: The varieties differed by their critical SWC (ϴ Discussion: The differential response to SWC suggests adaptation to distinct rainfall patterns. We identified several strongly differentially expressed genes not earlier associated with drought response in barley.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.